I use shampoo very rarely these days and just wash with conditioner once or twice a week. It's amazing that people were convinced to use shampoo and all the after-products in the first place. I suppose it's like the "most important meal of the day" nonsense with cereal - advertising with a bit of social dynamics and zero science behind it.
amorpheus
Kiss the ring and admit that it was a silly idea.
I have insisted on physical media for my stuff since the dawn of MP3's - in the form of hard disk drives. That's the physical media MVP in my book.
It's not something I would complain about, just amusing to observe.
Does it at least work with USB-PD to provide basic fast charging? That should be the minimum at this point.
That's the joke.
And I think science fiction generally does it that way for the viewers' sake.
A lot of people hated Edge of Tomorrow because Tom Cruise.
I've never seen people mention this as a problem, it's universally liked as far as I can tell. I have seen it mentioned humorously, as in "as a bonus, if you don't like Tom Cruise you can watch him die in this movie, like, a lot".
These are huge animals and can mess a human up, intentionally or not. Not keeping some separation when dealing with them is inherently risky.
His old show was better. But I can't imagine it working well any more, when reality is already so absurd.
I'm pretty happy with the results. My phone is around 88% health after 3.5 years. I haven't run a full charge cycle on my laptop for a while but it's in a similar ballpark after 4.5 years.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro here. Battery health is at 88% after 3.5 years of solid daily use. So it's certainly paying off, happy to see more and more devices offering a charge limit option now.
The observed staying power is somehow relative to how important it is to you personally.