That's not justification. "If they do it we can do it". If lose your morals in an effort to "get even", what makes one any better than the other?
"Scapegoat". Do you think death threats towards others is acceptable? It's easier to completely end discussion of those you mentioned rather than police every thread and remove threats.
Gets me excited for light no fire.
This thing is DOA, Samsung doesn't have the same rabid fan base as Apple. Headsets just don't work for productivity, they're still too bulky. You can ignore it while you're swinging your arms playing pistol whip, but not when you're looking at a spreadsheet.
All I take from this is that you're distraught I don't agree with you.
How does pointing that out make me a fanboy? Interesting you chose to call names and denounce instead of being civil like @[email protected]. Why is that?
Yes. 25% of U.S. citizens linguistically means 25% of all U.S. citizens. They don't need to specify alive, because they had to be alive inorder to participate. It is not dishonest in this case because they (the original study) listed the date the survey was conducted and didn't not try to portray an old study as modern.
The only thing needed is to add 'surveyed' after the descriptor. Anything else is dishonest.
Here in the next few weeks. I want to ensure nothing breaks, but I really just haven't gotten around to it.
You've made up something which I've never said. Government workers address, cellphone numbers, and email addresses are not publicly available. What does Elon Musk have to do with this?