It's so great to be able to find comments such as yours, unfortunately it feels uncommon in Lemmy specially when certain names are mentioned, the bias and willfulness to shit on those are making people a bit blindsided and easy to guide through bad data usage. My first thought reading the title was about the statistical value of the numbers given, which doesn't detract from the actual quality or lack thereof of the vehicle. At the moment using elon musk or tesla in a title of an article will increase the traffic automatically. Which is why we constantly get every single shitty comment made by him reported with useless data.
Yprum
joined 1 year ago
Google is going to likely sell his AI tech to the military, so you know... They are all shit. Which shit smells worse is a useless comparison, they are all shit.
Details schmetails... At the end of the week he is probably super duper repenting and asks for forgiveness. What, you want a perfect human? Who hasn't murdered someone on a bad week? Or raped? Or stolen? Or had an affair? Or all of it?
Hopefully not needed but just to be sure /s
Yeah, it makes it better and more reliable in harsh conditions, I agree, but driving has always been based on people looking where they go, so camera imagery is enough for driving. If it is not safe for a person, then it's not safe for a car with only cameras. Plus only having cameras doesn't mean you cannot use special equipment, IR cameras can improve visibility on harsh conditions too. Not that I mean they are used, but you know, it's a matter of what we mean with "enough to drive". Again, I want to emphasize that I agree, having LiDAR or other tech would be much much better.
+2 I used to love Nova but after the sell out I went looking for FOSS launchers and Lawnchair has provided the best alternative so far but it lacks a bit in personalisation options in comparison.
Yeah, he was listening, he listened and listened well. And what he learned is that there are sick people wasting resources he can take away.
For me that would be the transparent plastic cards used in gloom so that piling them over each other can add values or abilities or modify them.
I have been jungle in the past, mostly with Vi and sometimes Morgana. But I feel like as much as I try I can never be in the right place in the right time. Maybe this season I will try a bit with something different. Viktor mid has been fun and I would want to try a bit with Vi top, making her a bit more tanky (I just really like playing Vi).
There's two points of consideration here, let's see if I can make my point without a wall of text, I'm prone to those...
-
Anonimity: the fact that where you connect cannot know who exactly you are. This should be straightforward, anonimity should not be taken away, it is a core part of the internet in my opinion. It's extremely important that we can express ourselves freely without fear of being persecuted. Despite the negative sides that it has, as those with ill intent will be harder to find (but not impossible). In this the common quote attributed to Franklin applies well in my opinion: Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither.
-
Proof of personhood: basically the difficult task of making sure that the other end of an internet connection has a real person, and together with that, proof that it is different than others, the ability to know you are you and not someone else.
This is incredibly interesting as a technical problem to be solved, and I do agree with you that the internet as we know it is at risk if we don't solve it properly. It is specially hard to solve if you try to guarantee anonimity (like I believe it should be).
The wikipedia has an article about it that I think gives a good idea about the topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_personhood
Personally I have been quite carefully interested into the whole World ID solution, using a device called orb with open specifications that captures some data from your iris that should be unique per person, storing only an encrypted piece of information in a blockchain and on your device locally so that you can use it to identify yourself as a real unique person and only once, but wherever you use it, cannot know anything about you except that. There's a lot of possible criticism to such a system, but insofar as I have checked and can understand, it seems like a legit solution. But I leave here the link for anyone interested enough to check it themselves: https://world.org/world-id
The fact that you put those examples together with this Lagrange browser made me curious enough to check it, I had never heard of Gemini protocol before. So, simply put, thank you for sharing about this, I'm going to be installing Lagrange and start checking out geminispace.
view more: next ›
I loved reading your insights on the tech! E ink is such a fascinating tech... Pity about the NDA though, I would love to hear a lot more!
The title is mentioning e-paper though and if I have understood correctly that could imply a different tech is being used here. So here's what (I think) I know, e-paper is a broader category that includes other tech that is not e-ink but very low power screens, such as the screen used by the old smart watches Pebble, which had a color memory LCD that could achieve something like 20 fps or something like that? Just enough to create nice animations and fluid UI. Of course changing the screen meant higher consumption, but the LCD could keep the image by using a very low but non-zero energy.
Although it seems that e-paper and e-ink are commonly just mixed as if they would be the same, while to me e-ink is a type of e-paper. Do you feel my understanding is correct on how the tech is categorised and maybe the screen from the article could be memory LCD or something else that is not e-ink?