Ukraine surrendered nuclear weapons as a diplomatic concession - you can't credibly argue that there's no diplomacy.
With a nuclear deterrent either from Ukraine or NATO, Russia would be less likely to attack.
I'll absolutely point the finger at Russia when they're the one pissing on the diplomatic efforts, tearing up treaties, memoranda, and agreements, and invading their neighbours while threatening nuclear war and committing a bunch of warcrimes - how is this anyone's fault but theirs?
You're going to drop the pretence that you've got anything worthwhile to say and sulk off back to your little lair? Try not to fuck any kids on the way out, eh?
It'd take something a little stronger than the opinion of infamous kid fucker GreenKnight23 to pull my trigger, champ.
Woah there, kid fucker I didn't ask for your opinion.
As an Australian, I have no idea wtf you're talking about... or who this guy is, but he has suuuuper shady televangelist vibes - I assume he was a massive piece of shit, and likely sex pest - unless anyone is going to tell me otherwise?
This piece of shit fucks kids.
Not triggered in the slightest - I thought there might be something to learn. Thanks for clarifying that it was nothing more than the baseless opinion of a fragile moron.
Are you able to point to actions that Snowden has taken to negatively impact the interests of the US people or to materially aid Russia?
There was peace, then Russia invaded, then they're was peace, then Russia invaded, then there was peace, then Russia invaded. This military doctrine pre-dates Russia in the region. How is peace to be established and preserved when Russia pisses all over every treaty it signs, and demonstrates time and again that they only value peace as an opportunity to regroup? Maybe you could remind us why Ukraine gave up the nukes that would have deterred conflict today.
If you keep insisting that dumping decades-old military garbage that would otherwise be scrapped doesn't meaningfully aids the military industrial complex, I'm going to need to ask you how.
Are you thinking of Assange?
Yep - that's about as coherent as I expected.
A quick end to the war via a cessation of aid will see Ukraine annexed. There's a reason Ukraine went to war to stop that.
Manufacturing a situation to dump surplus military hardware doesn't meaningfully help the US - using what amounts to garbage and foreign troops to undermine a hostile state actor clearly does. There's no altruism necessary here.
Your desperation to leap to moral purity testing and American diabolism is leading you to some atrocious positions. Fuck me - take a win when there's one to be taken rather than throwing Ukraine to the bears.
Just like their precious founding fathers intended in the first amendment.
oh.