UntitledQuitting

joined 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 32 minutes ago

Complicit. But complacently so.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

It's a reference to Abraham Lincoln's first inaugural address:

"I am loath to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I’m not allowed to do my full-time job from any other computer besides the windows one assigned to me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

I bought a 14 pro and gave my nephew my X. Besides the island and the camera quality they are largely indistinguishable for almost all of my use-cases. And they are almost 5 years apart.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

if the lens you view novels through is art then this will upset you. If the lens you’re viewing them through is as information that is to be ingested, this will do just fine.

Books are allowed to be verbose and take risks in language, but I’d argue that in transferable information it’s inefficient.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

With the single example provided I’d say it did okay. Obviously in context that may change, but I don’t see this as much different from someone reading cliffs notes or something like blinkist.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

The article confused me, all 3 sentences. The article makes zero reference to Godzilla/monsterverse outside of the title. So legendary are trying to bulk up the impact of 2 announcements by making it seem like 1 film? Idk

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I thought your argument was that the movie industry isn’t immune to enshittification? I was pointing out how you’re correct by using a quote from a film exec that proves your point. Films are a business, and if businesses want to make money then they have to appeal to audiences, so course correction is possible. I’m allowed to live in my duality.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have faith in some kind of course correction, if it becomes profitable in some way. Otherwise we're watching the death of cinema in real time.

"We have no obligation to make art. We have no obligation to make history. We have no obligation to make a statement. But to make money, it is often important to make history, to make art, or to make some significant statement. We must always make entertaining movies, and, if we make entertaining movies, at times, we will reliably make history, art, a statement or all three. We cannot expect numerous hits, but if every film has an original and imaginative concept, then we can be confident that something will break through." -Michael Eisner

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

surely this is straight to d+ because that has to be the worst cinematography i've seen before.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Software and hardware are both wares aka goods or services that are for sale. Merchants deal in wares. Pirates deal in warez.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Was about to comment this. Those products are actually usable versions of apples vr. And they can be used with any device. Apples use case is so narrow that other companies overtook them out of the gate.

view more: next ›