UnPassive

My wife and I have wondered about this idea. If we were to have kids, we'd want them to be tech savy and inventive, but hopefully not get too addicted to the internet at a young age. There's something to be said about not buying them a computer, but letting them build one, I think. But it's an odd line to walk.

Definitely will say I was interested in what I couldn't have, but I do think there are healthier ways to fuel an interest. Hope that someday my kids will just want to tinker with my stuff

Yeah definitely some lasting consequence. I'm a pretty good liar, and extremely skilled at manipulating people to calm down. Sometimes I wish I stood my ground better and let there be friction between me and others. Instead I sort of morph into whatever they need, sometimes abandoning my core principals. It came in handy to save my siblings' asses a few times though. But literally just yesterday my wife was video calling her mom and showed her my brand new ear piercings (which I've wanted my whole life, but is a huge no no for men in Mormon circles, so it'll be a big deal when my side of the family finds out) - anyway, I wanna stretch/gauge them because I like the look of small tunnels, so my mother in law says, "they look so nice, but you won't gauge them, right?" And I'm like "no of course not" because I know it's probably a bit shocking to her that I pierced them at all. But I wish I instead said something non-commital like "not now, but I love the look of small gauges"

Overall, the biggest effect is probably the distance I feel towards my parents lol

If your curious, I'd describe myself as quite chill, but very reserved. I wouldn't even say I was constantly on guard... I was just a good liar. Got caught for very few things. I have a lot of siblings though (10), so I doubt I'd have had as much opportunity if I were an only child or something

It was more about moral concerns of the internet. Pretty common thing for Mormon parents to do. But yeah entertainment may have played a role, they weren't exactly what I'd call "active" parents.

They were scared of unmonitored access to the internet. And only up to T rated games were allowed, so for Halo I used to trade game cases with friends to hide what I owned. And since my parents were extremely Snoopy, I'd even switch my T rated games around so they thought I was just too lazy to match a game disk with it's case, and never get too suspicious.

Edit: Programming was allowed, just had to be on the shared computer in our living room where everyone could see what you were doing.

When I was leaving for college I bought a laptop and they made me keep it in the box until I left. It was honesty torture. I wanted to set it up and stuff but they insisted that our home computer would work fine...

My first Pi got me into computing which led to my software career now. Won it from a YouTube giveaway and kept it a secret because I wasn't allowed to have a computer. Put retroPi on it and told my parents it was for gaming. Coded my first game in Python (from a tutorial). I once put it in a crayon box and used that as a portable handheld. Later. Made a janky arcade cabinet. Sad that my kids may need to use a different brand device. I have no love for public companies

Science is different than peer reviewed science. The STI study has some big problems (especially moral problems) - one practical problem though is the hiv test in the study isn't accurate for some time (3 months I think) and that messes with their data and wasn't accounted for properly (some test candidates definitely had HIV before the study). Another huge oversight was that a freshly cut man isn't going to have sex for weeks while he heals, deceasing the chances of contracting HIV. Another sign that something is wrong is European countries that have less HIV than the USA. But even if it was guaranteed that you contact HIV 10% less often if circumcised, that's still not even close to a good enough benefit to justify the procedure.

The "data" on why circumcision is beneficial is mostly just cut men trying to justify why they're superior and is biased. The sensitivity being the same claims are silly. Studies done are controversial because measuring sensitivity is hard. A big red flag is reading testimants of adults who got cut - usually they say it was super painful while healing, then crazy sensitive, underwear was uncomfortable and they had trouble lasting during sex. But a couple years later and they'd lost sensitivity. Underwear feels fine, refactory period goes up. This is because of keratinization of the glans of the penis. Similar to a callous on skin tissue

Doctor Who x Ratchet and Clank

New nerves do grow. Muscly/fat/pregnant people have the same skin senstitivity. But there are special function bits that are lost. The Rigid Band has special nerve endings, gone forever. Frenellum too

Not sure how badly you want it back, but it is possible to restore. Non-sugically. Basically skin under tension causes Mitosis (skin cells dividing to make more skin) - think putting on weight, gaining muscle, getting pregnant, or ear gauges. You tug the skin long enough and eventually have your hoodie back. The results are surprisingly impressive. r/restoring_foreskin has a bunch of info

Treasure hunting story driven action game with dinosaurs, zombies, and aliens

I relate - the nights I have been motivated to do something else after work make me wonder if I'm actually beat, or just addicted to TV (Youtube for me). Always feel better and sleep better when I don't search mindlessly for something to entertain me while snacking nonstop. Even video games make me feel more fulfilled but I'm still struggling to watch less youtube. About to eat breakfast and of course I wanna watch a video while I do lol

Also trying to use less Youtube. I have quite a few hobbies and projects but Youtube sucks up at least a couple hours of my day. Didn't realize how addicted I was until I tried to use it less lol. Fortunately my recommended page has been way off lately