TheEntity

joined 1 year ago
[–] TheEntity 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Lots of my long-term friendships started with open-source projects. If that's your kind of thing, it's worth looking into. Either way it usually all boils down to a common hobby.

[–] TheEntity 9 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It depends. What's your estimated net worth?

[–] TheEntity 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Given how maimed the modern laptops are, I'm willing to consider "modern" a slur for laptops. Give me back my Ethernet, video outs and all the USB!

[–] TheEntity 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's probably very much failing according to the corporate metrics of infinite growth. Good!

[–] TheEntity 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Hopefully they meant that anyone not mentally ill due to the modern world being what it is, is mentally ill be default. Or something similar.

[–] TheEntity 17 points 1 week ago

In most countries you can, yes.

[–] TheEntity 47 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

FOUL TARNISHED!

[–] TheEntity 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that be the same thing with no other percentages in sight because we're subtracting from 100%?

[–] TheEntity 16 points 2 weeks ago

They have full legal rights to ban you for farting when the minute hand and hour hand aligned. This changes nothing in terms of what they "can" do. It's rather their public announcement about what they "will" do. If they really wanted to ban you for silly reasons, they don't even need these silly reasons, they can just ban you and are fully within their legal rights to do so.

[–] TheEntity 29 points 2 weeks ago

This but non-ironically. Not every movie needs a damn romance!

[–] TheEntity 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

From the Lemmy.world terms of service:

No one under 18 years of age or under the regulated minimum age defined by your local law (whichever is higher), is allowed to use or access the website.

If someone lies to access the website, it's on them.

[–] TheEntity 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don't think so. It's probably what keeps it small and more personal. There is also the notion of responsibility: if a person I invite causes trouble, it's potentially on me. Maybe not on the first infraction, but if one invites 20 spammers/cryptobros/venturecapitalists, it's reasonable to block the inviter too.

I'm not arguing one way or another (that's not my decision anyway), but I can understand why they do this.

181
Rule Man (lemmy.world)
 
view more: next ›