Tenniswaffles

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

From the original comment:

I'm fine saying that people like Dutroux, Breivick or Abdeslam shall not be out before a very long-time. However, they're not the average criminal.

Obviously they aren't for complete prison abolishment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

From context I gather you're from Belgium. Isn't there already OCMW/CPAS for free housing?

Just because they're from one country (assuming they actually are,) doesn't mean they're speaking from the perspective of that country. Most people will assume if you're speaking English you're from America or some such.

What do you do when it's the single mom in free housing that just wants 500EUR extra cash? Find political consensus to give her a bigger free house, with a pool, and a credit card?

You're just using a completely different scenario to move the goalposts. I believe that they're point was that imprisoning people for committing a crime in pursuit of basic survival is pretty fucking shitty.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Purple, spite.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Not even close.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You came across many very dumb people, therefore most people are dumb. Seems logical. I work with thousands of meat workers, therefore most people must be meat workers. Your experience is more or less selection bias.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If you were working tech support of course you're going to interact with more "tech illiterate" people. That doesn't mean the "most people" are tech illiterate, you were just dealing with a high volume of them, giving that impression.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

You don't see anything wrong with your language, but shockingly, the world doesn't revolve around you. Just because you think something is fine doesn't make it true.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Resources like gold would be more accessible, y'know because it already been mined and made into things. If society collapses what few survivors there are could recycle shit like metals. The actual issue is fossil fuels. Getting to a point where you can use renewable power would be difficult with using fossil fuels for power first.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Yes, that is generally how rom coms work

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, if you ignore the massive price difference and the fact that they need to be replaced periodically because rechargeable batteries usually only last a few years at most.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As if fruit and veg packing and processing plants are any better. As long as greedy humans are in charge people will be exploited as much as they possibly can regardless of what the industry is.

view more: next ›