TelepathicWalrus

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] TelepathicWalrus 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah I'll have a look on there and see what I can find. Also I didn't really mean hot swappable just swappable I guess. Thanks for the suggestion ๐Ÿ™‚

29
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by TelepathicWalrus to c/[email protected]
 

Hello,

I am looking for a good way to mount a daughter board to a motherboard that can be ~~hot~~ swappable. I would like it to be able to mount securely preferably with mechanical clips or fixings.

There will be up to 10A to go through it for power as well as around 10 signal pins. Obviously I can use several pins to get the required current rating.

I have seen DIN 41612 connectors but I am concerned about the daughter board coming loose.

If anyone can help me it would be much appreciated ๐Ÿ˜Š

 

Hi there,

I'm considering upgrading my old ender 3 and it looks like the prusa MK4 or bambu labs p1s are the current best options out there.

I like the bambu labs for the fast print speed and x/y print bed. I also love the idea of the AMS - it would be awesome to print in colour! But being closed source puts me off a bit as I currently use octopeint and obico to monitor my ender 3 which, as far as I can tell, Is not possible to use with bambu labs. Also having to upload gcode to the cloud is not ideal.

The prusa however is great because of the open source nature. However the slinger bed and slower prints are putting me off. I have also read that the mmu can be temperamental at best, so printing colour may not be an option?

Any thoughts/recommendations?

Thanks

[โ€“] TelepathicWalrus 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you know how much disk space this will roughly use? Are we talking 10GB or 100GB or 1TB? Just roughly speaking.

[โ€“] TelepathicWalrus 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you so much, I've made my account and browsing now!! Thank you!!!!!!

 

Hey, does anyone here have any drunkenslug invites that they would be willing to give me? It would be much appreciated! Thanks!

 

Hi there,

I wish to run a wireguard docker through a glueton docker so that i can access my paid vpn from my own server. This is what i want:

client -> wireguard docker(selfhosted) -> gluetun docker(connected to paid VPN) -> internet

I have posted before with this issue but still cannot get it to work as expected. I am not sure if there is issues with the wireguard docker not being able to route back through from gluetun as it is trying to force traffic through the tunnel.

Any help would be much appreciated.

docker-compose.yml:

services:
  gluetun_test:
    image: qmcgaw/gluetun
    container_name: gluetun_test
    cap_add:
      - NET_ADMIN
    ports:
      - "5010:5000"
      - "5011:8000"
     # Port of the WireGuard VPN server
      - "36843:36843/udp"
    environment:
      - VPN_SERVICE_PROVIDER=custom
      - VPN_TYPE=wireguard
      - WIREGUARD_PUBLIC_KEY=
      - WIREGUARD_PRIVATE_KEY=
      - VPN_ENDPOINT_IP=ip
      - VPN_ENDPOINT_PORT=port
      - WIREGUARD_ADDRESSES="10.2.0.2/32"

  wireguard:
    image: linuxserver/wireguard:latest
    container_name: wireguard
    cap_add:
      - NET_ADMIN
    environment:
      - PUID=1000
      - PGID=1000
    volumes:
      - ./wireguard/config:/config
#    ports:
      # Port for WireGuard-UI
#      - "5010:5000"
      # Port of the WireGuard VPN server
#      - "36843:36843/udp"
    network_mode: service:gluetun_test
    sysctls:
      - net.ipv4.conf.all.src_valid_mark=1

wg0.conf

# Address updated at:     2023-07-08 18:51:31.120262753 +0000 UTC
# Private Key updated at: 2023-05-09 18:59:02.233090133 +0000 UTC
[Interface]
Address = 10.252.1.0/24
ListenPort = 36843
PrivateKey = 
MTU = 1450
PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
PostDown = iptables -D FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
Table =

[Peer]
PublicKey = 
PresharedKey = 
AllowedIPs = 10.252.1.1/24
[โ€“] TelepathicWalrus 2 points 1 year ago

This didnt seem to help much. My problem is that when i tell the wireguard server to use gluetun as its network mode, i can not get any traffic to go from the client -> wireguard(my own server) -> gluetun(connected to nordvpn) -> internet as i want.

[โ€“] TelepathicWalrus 1 points 1 year ago

Would this be put in the post up part of wg0?

[โ€“] TelepathicWalrus 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, this is correct. I have a self-hosted Wireguard VPN which i connect to and i want my internet traffic to go through the gluetun docker through nordvpn. client -> wireguard container -> gluetun container -> internet

 

I have a paid external vpn(Nordvpn using gluetun) and am currently hosting my own wireguard vpn on my server through docker. is there a way to get the traffic from my selfhosted vpn to tunnel through my paid vpn? This is my docker-compose file atm.

services:
  gluetun_test:
    image: qmcgaw/gluetun
    container_name: gluetun_test
    cap_add:
      - NET_ADMIN
    ports:
      - "5010:5000"
      # Port of the WireGuard VPN server
      - "36843:36843/udp"
    environment:
      - VPN_SERVICE_PROVIDER=nordvpn
      - VPN_TYPE=wireguard
      - WIREGUARD_PRIVATE_KEY=redacted
      - SERVER_COUNTRIES=United Kingdom

  wireguard:
    image: linuxserver/wireguard:latest
    container_name: wireguard
    cap_add:
      - NET_ADMIN
    environment:
      - PUID=1000
      - PGID=1000
    volumes:
      - ./wireguard/config:/config
#    ports:
      # Port for WireGuard-UI
#      - "5010:5000"
      # Port of the WireGuard VPN server
#      - "36843:36843/udp"
    network_mode: service:gluetun_test

wg0.conf

[Interface]
Address = 10.252.1.0/24
ListenPort = 36843
PrivateKey = redacted
MTU = 1450
PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
PostDown = iptables -D FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
Table =

Any help would be great! Thanks!