Takapapatapaka

There's actually a typo, i wrote "relies or bullshit" instead of " on bullshit"

I disagree with you, links are not that long to share. It is a bit more time consuming obviously, but everyone can choose whether to read quickly or really dive in the sources. I see a lot of people doing it today on internet. I see a lot of people doing it in casual conversation (opening a book or internet to check smthg). It's not evidence, it's hints to avoid launching a whole discussion that entirely lies or bullshit (or not).

Here are some links I found about smuggled chips.

• Reuters : Deepseek said they used legally imported old and new nvidia chips (H800 and H20s). There are suspicions and investigations about illegal smuggling of banned from export nvidia chips, targeting directly Deepseek. One CEO of an american AI startup said it is likely Deepseek used smuggled chips.
• The Diplomat : exactly the same, citing directly Reuters. Adds that H800 (now banned from export) and H20s were designed by Nvidia specially for the chinese market. Adds that smuggling could go through Singapore, which leaped from 9% to 22% of Nvidia revenues in 2 years. Nvidia and Singapore representatives deny.
• Foxbusiness : same.

So it is likely there are smuggled chips in china if we believe this. Now to say they have been used by Deepseek and even more, that they have been decisive is still very unclear.

Youre talking about countries. I do not care abouy contries. Bombs do not protect people, guns do not protect people.

Killing peoples with guns in third world country to avoid killing with bombs in eu/na is not a win. Getting bombs or guns just temporarily deflects the violence on someone else. The day everyone has bombs, wars wont stop.

You cannot want a safe world for people and want bombs at the same time. It is only viable if you think abouy nations instead of people, but who cares?

I cannot agree with you more, and i'm very sad to see so much upvotes in favor of nuclear intensification Bombs do not protect from bombs, guns do not protect from guns

C'est intéressant, j'étais un peu sceptique mais les chiffres font du sens : quand on parle d'objectifs d'entreprises ou d'états à 15000 ou 40000 satellites, ça serait logique qu'on voit surtout ça. Je me demande quel est le taux actuel de points lumineux artificiels : j'aurais même pas dit 1/10, mais au final c'est peut-être déjà le cas.

Well both of us are imitating motorcycles, so it would even be very hard to write down the actual 'melody' to compare both. As said by others, it's also an easy and common thing to do on guitar. Plus both sounds are rythmically a bit different : Motley Crue do not have the fast bit at the beginning of Montrose, they do 3 bends rather than 4 and they are a bit slower. It still may be technically plagiarism but it would be on a very small scale

Im no expert at all, but I think it might be hallucination/coincidence, skew of training data, or more arbitrary options even : either the devs enforced that behaviour somewhere in prompts, either the user asked for something like "give me the answer as if you were a chinese official protecting national interests" and this ends up in the chain of thoughts.

That's interesting, I thought there already were judgments in this direction.

For more details, french law has an article that says spouses mutually compel to live in partnership. (don't know how to translate it best, "les époux s'obligent mutuellement à une communauté de vie"). This is a very unclear sentence, which has been considered by judges to imply that it requires spouses to live under the same roof and to have sex. I think i remember hearing of a ruling stating that in the case of a lesbian lady and an asexual man that got together to have a social facade and live their sexual lives separately, they still were "living in partnership" and that the absence of sex could not cancel their union, but maybe it was only stated once.

That was one part that disgusted me a lot when learning about french law, glad it's changing for the better, hope it will change faster.

There is a pyramidal conception of rules in the france legal system, something like local regulation < regional regulation < decree < law < international law < constitution. So judgements in courts created by international laws are technically stronger than national judgments.

Also, the decisions of judges have no imperative power, but they are used by judges to solve future cases, and have a de facto big impact on the interpretation of laws. It's called jurisprudence : to say it quickly, when a judge does not know how to handle an unclear law, they look at what other judges said before.

Very common in my experience of french politics to distinguish between anti-Zionism and antisemitism.

It's also a lot more used since the genocide is an important subject, so that may explain why you see it a lot more used in the last two years.

A version of the mario classic is definitively a good idea, and you're also right in keeping it for later and trying more simple stuff first.

Idle/clicker sounds like a good idea.

On a tiny bit more advanced one, i would recommend something with a little bit of world persistency, like an exploration game with multiple rooms were the player has to place/retrieve objects. I found myself struggling with learning the benefits and limitations of the scene system and i think this could help.

More generally, I think a 2D platformer game is a good one to try : not too complicated, especially if there are no fights, but still requires to get used to most basic elements.