Syrc

I mean, people paid for it on Facebook and the likes are arguably even worse at their job so…

I mean, I think reading has become even more important now that a lot of what we do and see is in the “screen world”… I just fear that social media and in general the clickbait culture brought people to only read/understand what aligns with their beliefs. And sadly older generations are just as affected as younger ones.

US McDonalds, specifically. JP ones are better apparently, and I can confirm EU ones are too (although they do mess up orders from time to time).

First, that’s not what you asked.

Second, there’s not a single mention to Discord in their comments.

Third, they literally listed instances under the US law, which I suppose is what you’re asking for.

Haha, your post that’s “been up for a month” has been up for a week dude. Don’t just lie to me, it’s silly.

…are you able to read? “one of the top posts on .world for the past month” means that, among what has been posted in the past month, that post is one of the most upvoted. I never referred to how long it’s been up, I’m just saying that being an extremely popular post, it’s impossible for admins to not have seen it. And yet it’s still up, with comments full of insults for the CEO. Which means those comments are perfectly okay.

Also, you’re comparing the OP which is for ALL OF Lemmy.world, to the post you linkedbon Reddit, which is for a single Popculture related subreddit? r/Popculture is just one sub my guy.

The r/popculture mods are acting after being specifically notified by Reddit Admins about it. Which means they explicitly told them they’re not okay with those things.

Do I have to highlight what YOU quoted?

We are generally aiming to avoid content organizing, glorifying or suggesting to harm people or animals, but we are limiting the scope of our ToS to build the minimum framework inside which we all can have discussions, leaving a broader area for moderators to decide what is and isn’t allowed in the communities they oversee.

It literally says that it’s allowed.

and for goodness sakes, don’t beat around the bush like this. Make stark definitions so we all know what ball game we’re playing and why.

There is a stark definition. Don’t talk about killing people that are currently alive. That’s it.

I’m seriously worried about most commenters here’s reading comprehension. This whole post is saying “you know all the stuff mods deleted recently? We had a talk and 99% of that is now allowed” and people are still acting like this turned into some insanely policed pro-capitalism instance.

Are all these people really that upset at not being able to use this specific instance to convince people to kill more CEOs? I mean, if someone is already that fed up with the system I don’t think a random Lemmy comment is what will push them over the edge.

What do you want an answer for, “why is Lemmy better than Reddit”?

What post have you been reading? There is nothing forbidding you from talking positively about what happened or dunking on Thompson.

This is one of the top posts on .world for the past month and the comments are full of people memeing about it or saying he deserved it.

Meanwhile on Reddit

CongRats!

Now there’s only Fauna left from Promise, hopefully she can do it before the day comes…

And it’s not a banned topic, in fact.

Talking about the concept of jury nullification, about the times where it was applied, and how it could be applied to current cases are all allowed, according to what they wrote.

The only thing that’s not allowed is using it as a motive to incentivize future crimes (violent ones specifically, as other types of crimes would obviously not fall under “advocation of violence”). Aka “they should kill (guy), whoever does it will probably not even go to jail because of jury nullification”.

23% voted for Trump, and 55% also indirectly did by not voting or going third-party.