Seudo

proofs of idiocy and/or bad faith they offer

Then a downvote is justified, same user or not.

100%

10 of the biggest

Always handy when a pop-sci article discredits itself without having to read it.

I thought it was Clarke since it's known as Clarketech.

Despite knowing so much more than we did, the ol' quip holds true,
Anyone who claims to understand quantum physics is either lying or insane.

There's nothing in the legislation that prevents the (predominantly white European) government from continuing to cherry pick. We don't need another excuse to be apathetic about indigenous issues.

Either way, some of us whities just don't feel comfortable determining the future of indigenous people.

F in the chat for victims of the Great Oxygenation Event.

More likely there's a bunch of data points it can use. Coming within BT range of someone who does have a cat for example. Otherwise all the major smart phone companies would need to be in collision to keep the secret because the battery drain would be so blatant of it was recording, processing, transfering etc.

Well there was this bloke called Captain Cook right...

Entirely depends on how it's to be structured. Which the public didn't vote on. Done correctly I do agree on the optics of an official body though.

I'd say less. Still finding my place here but the comment section seems more polarised than on Reddit. The recent Australian referendum for example. Any nuanced discussion is impossible (only in some instances I'm sure) because alternative opinions make you a racist according to the average (most vocal at least) commenter. It's sad because as in that instance and regardless of politics, it often means a bunch of white people dictating what is/isn't, true/false, wanted/needed... important.