Protegee9850

Again, you’re obviously ignorant of how this stuff actually works. That is simply not the case. Otherwise the training set would necessarily need to have images of every type that you hope to generate, an impossibility and which obviously isn’t the case - a very quick look at some of the crazier things people have generated disprove it. Training the model on nude and clothed images of adults and clothed images of children - as others have pointed out - would allow you to generate nude images of children. Could a model have been fine tuned with CSAM - yes; but it’s certainly not a given, and probably not necessary.

The stable diffusion sub has somewhat migrated over to the fediverse. You can find more information about how this stuff actually works beyond your introductory understanding of the concept there.

That’s a hell of a leap and seems to be based in ignorance of the technology.

It’s been “official” that it’s going to restart time and time again. Hold the line. Keep raising hell. They won’t dare turn payments on again a month before an election

That is super slick

Okay but seriously 🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖

Citizen friggin Kane. Casablanca.

Damn. Those are some good films.

Generative AI. Copyright maximalists and academics who are far-too-precious-about-their-particular-brand-of-bullshit may hate away, but the technology works, it works really well (and better every day), and the possibilities it's unlocking for creative output are incredible.

Yeah there’s a reason everyone that’s worked in the field has a Stallman horror story. Love the ideas but Stallman has been a POS for a while.

Pseudonymous just means it’s slightly more annoying for you. Given the reidentification that happens readily to “deidentified” information you’re absolutely getting that information tied back to you in some data broker database.

I want it like Kbin better but find it’s UI inscrutable

Probably a significant number of bots tbh.