ProfessionalHandJob

Bro.

Was that gay? Or, are you wearing socks.

Fixed.

Sorry that took a couple hours.

I get dispensary cutied occasionally and buy/try new products I didn't pre-order/budget for.

tbh, could be bots or something. I was out for a bit and just came home to the lemmy instance being down and needing a reboot.

Agree 100%, !@[email protected] is pretty bad ass for finding/posting all these awesome memes.

Looks super interesting. Another one of those devices that might be good for a trip. Multi-use, less stuff to carry.

Gonna have to try it.

I ain't got nothin better to do so might as well run a server forever

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

its simple and i like it

That part of the image has this link in it https://www.canorml.org/vaporizers/

In that article, the first link to "Study: Vaporizers Deliver Safe, Reliable Doses Of Cannabinoids" works and so do the links it references if you want to go down a rabbit hole. It'll prob explain better somewhere along the way than most people could.

but the second link "Laboratory studies by California NORML and MAPS" goes to a dead page.

ya lol

every so often i'll go at it with a mr clean eraser and some ISO to get it lookin new again.

As long as I dump it out at the end of the sesh when it's still hot the oven stays "clean enough".

Although participation will always be somewhat unequal, there are ways to better equalize it, including:

• Make it easier to contribute. The lower the barrier, the more people will jump through the hoop. For example, Netflix lets users rate movies by clicking a star rating, which is much easier than writing a natural-language review.
• Make participation a side effect. Even better, let users participate with zero effort by making their contributions a side effect of something else they're doing. For example, Amazon's "people who bought this book, bought these other books" recommendations are a side effect of people buying books. You don't have to do anything special to have your book preferences entered into the system. Will Hill coined the term read wear for this type of effect: the simple activity of reading (or using) something will "wear" it down and thus leave its marks — just like a cookbook will automatically fall open to the recipe you prepare the most.
• Edit, don't create. Let users build their contributions by modifying existing templates rather than creating complete entities from scratch. Editing a template is more enticing and has a gentler learning curve than facing the horror of a blank page. In avatar-based systems like Second Life, for example, most users modify standard-issue avatars rather than create their own.
• Reward — but don't over-reward — participants. Rewarding people for contributing will help motivate users who have lives outside the Internet, and thus will broaden your participant base. Although money is always good, you can also give contributors preferential treatment (such as discounts or advance notice of new stuff), or even just put gold stars on their profiles. But don't give too much to the most active participants, or you'll simply encourage them to dominate the system even more.
• Promote quality contributors. If you display all contributions equally, then people who post only when they have something important to say will be drowned out by the torrent of material from the hyperactive 1%. Instead, give extra prominence to good contributions and to contributions from people who've proven their value, as indicated by their reputation ranking.

Your website's design undoubtedly influences participation inequality for better or worse. Being aware of the problem is the first step to alleviating it, and finding ways to broaden participation will become even more important as the web's social networking services continue to grow.