Polydextrous

joined 2 years ago
[–] Polydextrous 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, as I said, it’s a casual observation from an outsider. Historically, sure, you could very much argue there is a trend toward machismo and patriarchal structures in Spain, as well as a lot of spanish-speaking countries. I personally got myself in a lot of situations where I was observing a man acting really aggressively toward a woman and intervened. Everyone around me (my local friends) found it really weird that I would see an issue and/or step in out of some sense of duty. Even one or two of the women that I was attempting to help would sort of seem taken aback.

Again, I’m making a huge generalization, but there is something to be said about the difference in interpersonal relationships across different cultures. And in my experience, in Spain in particular, I noticed very sort of “aggressive” tactics of “flirting” among spanish men toward women in general, but also on the flip side, got the impression that the Spanish women grew to be very strong in pushing back when it came to unknown men. Again, these are my thoroughly biased, anecdotal findings from my years spent there.

But again, there’s also a noticeable difference in race relations. More sort of blunt racism that is treated as “normal,” whereas in my country the racists are more likely to coat their racism or deny it while obviously having a racist bent to their words and actions.

Spain is a pretty religious country, and that does tend to go hand-in-hand with some sense of patriachal behavior/thinking in a lot of cases. Now, I also lived in South America for a few years and there are some similar patterns there. But in my mind, Spain is distinctly more noticeable in these respects.

[–] Polydextrous 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, my belief is you’re right. Which is all we can know on a matter of ethics. Isn’t that the first sort of “rule” in the categorical imperative? Act in such a way as you believe should become the norm?

If these people are saying being charged with felonies makes you a bad person, then every single person charged with felonies should be treated the same way. That’s inherently wrong.

Dislike someone for their moral failings. And Donald trump and his fascist cronies have…fuckin tons of moral failings. That’s what makes them bad people. They hate for orientation, skin color, poverty, they steal, lie in an effort to hurt others…the list goes on. But nowhere on that list would be “charged with a crime.” Now, what they did to be charged with a crime is entirely fair game. Because those are moral failings. But to say, “he’s an alleged felon, fuck him” is beyond wrong. Because if you apply that thinking to everyone, we’ll, you’re writing off a whole lot of people for the same reason.

The government doesn’t make our moral decisions for us. They make value rulings for the status quo.

[–] Polydextrous 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not to mention culture in the country of Spain is very patriarchal. The women are, in turn, very strong themselves because they deal with so much “macho” bullshit. It’s crazy.

I mean, take this all with a grain of salt. This is my perception living there for a few years as a man from the US. It’s noticeably different, and we have large swaths of the country that operate on a similar male-centric mindset.

[–] Polydextrous 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

“Company builds entire business model on tricking consumers and overcharging for basic flight needs”

Now let’s do every single airline for operating like fucking organized crime and gouging people for using the previously free space built into the fucking plane. The entire industry is out of fucking date and needs to be done away with

[–] Polydextrous 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We’re gonna need a bigger pool

[–] Polydextrous 3 points 1 year ago

Genuinely unhinged.

I mean, the logic behind it is, without question, solid: if they said no, they could kiss any chance of continuing to raise money getting half a whiff of the office goodbye. What’s insane is that this is how far things have gone. These people, while running for president, have no choice but to say they would forgive the obvious front runner for anything and everything, just because they’re going to need to rely on votes from people that would.

If the question were, “how many of you would drop to your knees on live television and fellate Mr. Trump to prove how much you respect him and the United States of America?” the results wouldve been the exact same. They probably would’ve gotten every single hand raised, actually.

[–] Polydextrous 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What the fuck that smile is going to haunt my goddamn dreams

[–] Polydextrous 19 points 1 year ago

Not to mention “The World.”

[–] Polydextrous 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s not even clandestine. They’re openly admitting they’re using the vulnerabilities as a way to spy.

[–] Polydextrous 6 points 1 year ago

Entirely dependent on the job I’m working. I work in film, so sometimes we’re on a prelight and the day is 12hr, I could work anywhere from four to maybe 10. Then some days were on 10hr shoot days, and I could work maybe 30 min. And then there are days like this week, working a documentary on multiple locations, and I worked a collective maybe 40 min/day (with a 9:30 call and me leaving by 2-3 while getting paid for 12hr).

[–] Polydextrous 0 points 1 year ago

Seeing as how electrolytes are in water, I’d say all the time?

view more: ‹ prev next ›