Polydextrous

joined 2 years ago
[–] Polydextrous 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You’re looking at it. It’s as real as this text you’re reading!

[–] Polydextrous 12 points 2 years ago

Yeah, it’s hot. Heat rises. Therefore, vis a vis, indubitably, light goes up.

[–] Polydextrous 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Like…how is this even a thing?

“People are dying” should be the last fucking statement on it. Fuck your goddamn profits. Eat my dick. Fuck capitalism

[–] Polydextrous 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did AI put this “article” together?

[–] Polydextrous 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Come on, you can’t be that naive. Yes, misunderstandings happen. But what are the chances that this reporter had a misunderstanding exactly when it was most politically expedient for him?

There is this weird thing people do in modern politics, where the people that have the same political beliefs they do can just never be wrong. People have their team, and everything that comes out of anyone with the same color shirt on or the right letter next to their name is suddenly defensible, no matter how obviously silly or ridiculous.

Like communists will defend every single massacre perpetrated under the banner of communism. It’s absolutely insane. Just admit that people who you agree with can do/say things that are just wrong. It’s not that hard. And it doesn’t make your convictions less your convictions.

[–] Polydextrous 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“40 hour unpaid suspension” is literally just called a weekend.

[–] Polydextrous 3 points 2 years ago

Mount Etna was based and trill all along. Rippin mad clouds

[–] Polydextrous 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

If he only said it the first time, I’d agree with you that it’s possible. But he said it, and then said it again more clearly. I’m sorry, but you can’t chalk this up to “he didn’t understand/hear.” If it were really loud there, even, and he said it twice, maybe you’d have a point. But it was not very loud where they were standing.

Not to mention, he had the context of the conversation they were having. He was trying to goad them into spouting their rhetoric. There’s no way, given the context, the volume of the area, the fact that he said it twice…I’m sorry, you can’t buy his bullshit back peddling.

I think exactly what they’d hope would happen has happened: create a controversy to become the new OAN. I, for sure, had never heard of “far right news” or whatever the fuck the name of that “network” was.

[–] Polydextrous 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah, definitely. I was going to say something along the lines of, they do this and then tell us all we don’t like soccer.

And the only reason I was actually watching ESPN was because I looked up at the gym and saw, on one of the 25 TVs, something actually interesting, so I started paying attention. And then they showed three goals in under a minute and then said the score was 5-0. And jumped as quick as they could back to American football players talking about a season that hasn’t even started yet. Ffs

[–] Polydextrous 2 points 2 years ago

So, what happened?

[–] Polydextrous 1 points 2 years ago
[–] Polydextrous 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To clarify, because I can’t seem to edit the post: this was obviously on the highlights/sports news segment. They went on to spend like five minutes talking about the season that hasn’t started yet. Not to mention, they spent at least five minutes on training camp shit BEFORE the women’s WC highlights too.

view more: ‹ prev next ›