OwenEverbinde

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This commenter is weirdly passionate about what kinds of porn Blahaj federates with.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They are showing kindness and understanding and openness and giving you the benefit of the doubt right now.

Meanwhile, you scramble and grasp for words that you imagine might somehow hurt.

You're the only one who looks unnerved. You're clearly bothered by the calm, compassionate, composure that none of your provocations can crack.

Ephemeral Sun hasn't stooped to your level once.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am amazed they haven't run out of money already.

Were they all millionaires before this whole Trump thing started?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone else here mentioned that being an LGBTQ+ instance and allowing association with porn occasionally described as "childlike" isn't something Blahaj can afford in this political climate.

They're already being called child groomers. You don't want something that can be twisted into ammunition by bad actors.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

Exactly this. Right wing propaganda already portrays the LGBTQ+ community as child groomers who are sexualizing minors.

Forget gasoline or lighter fluid: allowing federation with "barely 18!" content would throw a whole propane tank on that fire.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Gold fringes on the flag of the country "Donald Trump" was president of? Damn it! We've been bamboozled! We aren't even living in the real United States! We were the sheeple all along, just like they were trying to tell us!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah! Was he Donald Trump -- the person -- president? Or was it "Donald Trump" the legal entity? Is his name capitalized on the documents? Was his presidency valid under maritime law?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To the people who watch these sources they believe its legitimate, real and true.

One year after leaving California, my mother was explaining to me -- based on some selfie video made by two Christians sitting in their car, claiming they had visited San Francisco -- that California was now a hotbed for crime and violent death.

It's not like they suddenly changed their story. For decades now, conservative vloggers and bloggers and "news" networks have been screaming about how California was a post-apocalyptic wasteland and millions of refugees were fleeing the state. She just... tuned it out while she was living in the proverbial horse's mouth, and then started trusting them the second the first-hand evidence was (I am not exaggerating here. She is now in the next state over.) two hours in her rear-view mirror.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, we already have government research funding a lot of medicine. Hell, the MRNA vaccine was DARPA'S doing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Okay... I'm a bit confused... but I think you are saying the worker in the private company provides -- as his main product -- labor, even though he's still directly responsible for the creation of the sprocket that he poured. And that he is rewarded for his labor, which is his primary contribution, even though he receives no direct reward for the creation of the sprocket.

Am I understanding you? Please ignore everything below this if I'm not understanding you.

On the other hand, if I am understanding you correctly, please read on: the worker in the co-op performed the same task. And unlike the private worker, the co-op worker is given a reward for more than just his labor. He's given a vote in who the sprocket is sold to, a vote in the price set when the sprocket is sold, a vote in the exact mixture of ores going into the sprocket, and (without needing to ask for a raise, without needing to change jobs) the worker in the worker co-op gets a voice in how much he gets paid, what hours he gets scheduled, and how much vacation and sick leave he is allowed.

The worker in the worker co-op gets a voice in general. Agency.

I don't see how those two things just seem like different flavors of "company" to you. One strips the worker of everything but his labor. The other gives him a voice.

To me, that makes them opposites.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can see that. Like how Hitler wrote Mein Kampf during his 264-day incarceration in Landsberg Prison for his Jan-6-style insurrection attempt.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Damn. Their $1.3 billion in profits was already stretched thin with these writers' demands. How will they afford this too? One of the execs might need to take out a second mortgage on his thirteenth mansion just to make ends meet.

 

@[email protected] asked "why are folks so anti-capitalist?" not long ago. It got quite a few comments. But I noticed a trend: a lot of people there didn't agree on the definition of "capitalism".

And the lack of common definition was hobbling the entire discussion. So I wanted to ask a precursor question. One that needs to be asked before anybody can even start talking about whether capitalism is helpful or good or necessary.

Main Question

  • What is capitalism?
  • Since your answer above likely included the word "capital", what is capital?
  • And either,
    • A) How does capitalism empower people to own what they produce? or, (if you believe the opposite,)
    • B) How does capitalism strip people of their control over what they produce?

Bonus Questions (mix and match or take them all or ignore them altogether)

  1. Say you are an individual who sells something you create. Are you a capitalist?
  2. If you are the above person, can you exist in both capitalist society and one in which private property has been abolished?
  3. Say you create and sell some product regularly (as above), but have more orders than you can fulfill alone. Is there any way to expand your operation and meet demand without using capitalist methods (such as hiring wage workers or selling your recipes / process to local franchisees for a cut of their proceeds, etc)?
  4. Is the distinction between a worker cooperative and a more traditional business important? Why is the distinction important?
 

This isn't so much a support request as a piece of advice. I just wanted to pass along a heads-up to save someone else some work.

The Bionic Reader Firefox extension breaks my ability to comment and reply on Lemmy.

This Image is With the Extension Enabled.

As you can see, the reply button has been clicked. It's grayed out. But the page stays stuck there. And when I refresh, my attempted comment is nowhere to be found.

The Firefox error codes are also different between having this extension enabled and not having it enabled. I'll post those in the comments.

 

Original Title:Is there a workaround for federation errors with comment replies?

Here's a screenshot of the problem on dropbox

When I hit "reply" on someone's comment (in this case a post all the way over on lemmy.ca: https://reddthat.com/post/350705) it just grays out, and never posts the reply.

Plus, there are more comments on https://feddit.de/post/1392810 than show up on the reddthat version. I imagine that's probably just something I don't understand about lemmy?

I know switching to my phone and finding the comment on liftoff or wefwef allows me to post, which is why I'm hoping one of you knows an exact workaround, including how to use wefwef or liftoff to easily find the comment I'm trying to respond to.

Update 1:

It works on Google Chrome! Reddthat can post comments on other instances just fine using Google Chrome. It's only Firefox that's having this problem right now. (Meaning it's not actually a federation glitch.)

Update 2:

It was my bionic reader extension on firefox. Sorry Tiff. I did not mean to put you through all that debugging for a problem that wound up being a bad extension on my end.

view more: next ›