Oisteink

joined 2 years ago
[–] Oisteink 2 points 1 month ago

Goweff department - not doge. Why let him spit on doge and use that name?

[–] Oisteink 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes - the large language model that draws.

[–] Oisteink 6 points 1 month ago
[–] Oisteink 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Whats SAA soldiers?

[–] Oisteink 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oo - this foss thing is just redhat content??

[–] Oisteink 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well - this sub is just for spreading misinformation. So its not the place to go for discourse. Lemmy isnt lonely, but the noise to Signal is high

[–] Oisteink 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Depends on what you’d want. A dockerfile defines how the image is built. If you want to mimic this then you need scripts.

But I think you could benefit from learning how docker works from the ground up if you want to recreate docker inages in lxc.

Better use is a dedicated docker host (a vm) and run your non-docker on lxc. Treat lxc as a minimal vm for one ( or a few) services/apps per lxcontainer

[–] Oisteink 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That depend on how much work you have to do to keep it working.

Let’s take a fairly common webserver like Caddy. Now you can install this through docker, or natively on linux.

If the app only exists as docker image then it cones down to your ability or recreating what the dockerfile does to get it installed on your lxc container.

Fun fact: early editions of docker used lxc for its containers.

[–] Oisteink 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Lastly there is podman that some people love for container management. It’s not my cup of tea, but it might fit you.

Install on a vm though, not lxc

[–] Oisteink 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Backup of docker would either be full host - for a simple and inflexible setup, or you do data and config backup (volumes mounted in docker), and rely on docker rebuilding the images.

This last type is more overhead in configuration of backup, but you can restore your containers on any host, individually

[–] Oisteink 2 points 1 month ago

There are big differences between these two technologies. LXC is closer to a virtual machine than a docker setup. You could mimic most of a dockerfile if you wanted, but it’s not a replacement.

Most of us will use a mix og docker-hosts(vm’s running docker) and lxc. Reasons for this is that some stuff is easier to maintain in docker as it’s the preferred release channel.

You can also move vm’s to other datacenter hosts if needed - and with shared storage this is quick and mean no downtime. Lxc are stuck on the host.

[–] Oisteink 3 points 1 month ago

Must be universal truth as it comes from trustworthy Amazon

view more: next ›