I have no idea about the first question. The answer to the second is that this meme has been reposted so many times it is no longer a whole meme.
ObviouslyNotBanana
I've never seen it before I found it either, and I assumed it would be longer because nothing else makes sense. So I looked it up but in the end I thought it would be a better post in the state I found it tbh
Thanks, I've been working on it
Sir, this is a shitposting community. We're horsing around.
Jag visste att de inte gillade krypterade appar, men ärligt talat hade jag inte förväntat mig något sådant. Tänkte avinstallera den, men det visade sig att jag redan gjorde det eftersom den drar sjuhelvetes mycket batteri.
Another part of the equation for me is that the creators get a larger piece of the cash pie. YouTube still gets their cut from the premium membership, just as it does with ads. But the piece that otherwise goes to the the ad budget goes to the creator instead.
Yeah, I wasn't trying to be rude though I get that the pic without context came off pretty odd. I was just trying to illustrate to others how it would actually be worth not having ads blasted in your face for 7000 hours.
If premium turns ad-supported I will re-evaluate my decision, of course.
Premium, yeah
A great many hours.
edit: for context, I have 7000 hours of uninterrupted streaming on YouTube. It's been well worth the cost to me. But this is with the model being ad-free. If that ever changed I would need to re-evaluate my position, but I do like that my subscription can give support to creators (support which is larger per view than that of an ad user) at the same time.
Actually the premium user is worth more to creators because a premium user gives them a bigger slice than ad users.
This is why RFK Jr is solving the problem and Making America Horsey Again