Nalivai

joined 2 years ago
[–] Nalivai 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What's its advantages over Terminator? Does it have any?

[–] Nalivai 1 points 1 day ago

Fter the first year usually they stop

[–] Nalivai 1 points 1 day ago

After finishing Tactical Breach Wisards, I have decided to revisit the whole defenestration trilogy and now I can't stop playing Heat Signature.

[–] Nalivai 9 points 2 days ago (4 children)

cook pasta like french fries

I'm sorry, what now?

[–] Nalivai 17 points 5 days ago

Brave isn't a thrust-worthy company

[–] Nalivai -3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Damn, genocide, huh. Good thing you showed them genociders what's what, now there will be no genocides at all

[–] Nalivai -4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

calls themselves core voters

don't vote

[–] Nalivai 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It is a solution for underage gambling, but adult gambling is also a problem

[–] Nalivai 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

There is hope that despite them better knowing how the government works than the last time, they are still ultimately too stupid, stubborn, and unlikable to achieve their goal at dismantling democracy. They will do a lot of lasting damage though.

[–] Nalivai 12 points 1 week ago

The problem here is that a lot of the time looking for hidden problem is harder than writing good code from scratch. And you will always be at a danger that llm snuck some sneaky undefined behaviour past you. There is a whole plethora of standards, conventions, and good practices that help humans to avoid it, which llm can ignore at any random point.
So you're either not spending enough time on review or missing whole lot of bullshit. In my experience, in my field, right now, this review time is more time consuming and more painful than avoiding it in the first place.
Don't underestimate how degrading and energy sucking it is for a professional to spend most of the working time sitting through autogenerated garbage, and how inefficient it is.

[–] Nalivai 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A technology that makes people put bad code is a problematic technology. If your team/project managed to overcome it's problems so far doesn't mean it is good or overall helpful. Peoole not seeing the problem is actually the worst part.

[–] Nalivai 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That's good, commendable, and necessary. But it might not be enough. I don't think we are at the point of murder yet, but we are definitely past the point of just voting.

view more: next ›