MotoAsh

IMO, the most important parts are to document the actual intent of the code. The contract of what is being documented. Sure, it's only so useful in perfectly written code, but NO code is perfect, and few will come through later with full context already learned.

It makes it sooo mich easier to know what is intended behavior and what is an unchecked edge case or an unexpected problem. If it's a complicated thing with a lot of fallout, good documentation can save hours of manually lining up consequences and checking through them for sanity.

You might say, "but that's indication of bad code!". No. Not really. Consequences easily extend past immediate code doing things as trivial as saving data to the database without filtering, or having a publicly available service. Even perfectly coded things come up with vulnerabilities all the time due to underlying security issues. It's always great to have an immediate confirmation of what's supposed to happen whether it's immediate code or some library with a new quirk in a new version.

Wrong. Look up the definitions. They literally reference each other as same.

I felt that about many joints when I slacked off on working out for a few months in my 20s. I was still lifting enough to keep my muscles from too much atrophy, but my joints got... lazy? Dynamic motion and heavier weights suddenly felt (as suddenly as me taking exercise more serious again) like my joints were the limiting factor.

and then I overworked my arms and got something like tennis elbow and basically had to rehab myself back to being able to exercise, all without my muscles being the limiting factor!

Take care of your body, folks. You can go over 100% when you're young, but your body makes you pay when you're older!

Reminds me of the stories of the people who do crazy stuff on adrenalin rushes, like lift a car off their dying child, and then end up potentially hospitalized or otherwise extremely sore for months. I think I get it now...

Very good point! I just wanted to point out the stupidity of even remotely implying other countries don't try to tackle this issue in MUCH better ways.

I'd even argue that shutting down speech is specifically not "trying to solve" it. At all. It's literally deciding to not talk about it. Few problems get better when they cannot even be freely discussed...

There should be a civics test in odder to vote.

First question should be, "Are the Affordable Care Act and Obamacare the same plan?"

Anyone who answers "no" in 2024 never gets to vote again... for literally being too fucking stupid and gullible. That's what the paper should say. They should be legally declared gullible morons.

It's not reallya misspelling. It's an alternate spelling for a different form of the word. A word that started colloquially. Either way, several words have multiple accepted spellings even outside of regional stuff like color/colour. Pallet and palette are two normal spellings of that word with different main meanings but nigh equivalent over-all meanings, for example. I know I've ran in to many more, but the brain's still starting up...

In addition to what others have said, other countries HAVE tried things, and they do work. Things like the child tax credit and direct subsidies bump things in the right direction. Imagine if they required pay to keep up with inflation and actually required companies provide adequate maternity and paternity leave...

Appeal to authority falacy and ad hominem. Genuinely, pathetic of you.

I dunno', this one's quite a bit worse. 100 situps, pushups, and squats aren't exactly easy like doing the alphabet. At least if someone did Saitama's exercise, they would be in decent shape, just not a well balanced in shape.

I have bad news for you: The Confederates did survive the war, and the north made the mistake of pardoning and accepting LITERAL TRAITORS back in to Congress et. al.