I don't think the 2000s have much of anything. We keep remaking old things.
Melonpoly
joined 1 year ago
South Africa is a joke of a country, 30 years after apartheid and they've somehow managed to make things worse for themselves.
Company leadership is fucking blind then
Most? Have you read all 600+ negative reviews?
Ubisoft has clearly made a name for itself by making mediocre content and this game has only reinforced that image but being upset about that is wrong apparently.
The game clearly doesn't appeal to the majority of players and that makes you upset. Blaming the "ubisoft haters" or the "anti woke" just sounds like you're trying to find a convenient scapegoat for why the game isn't doing well. If the game was good people would play it regardless of who the publisher is.
So are you fine with people not enjoying the game if it's got nothing to do with Ubisoft? Because a lot of the reviews are just that.
Fair enough, thanks
Why do you feel the need to defend a large company from a negative image that they have created for themselves?
I see, I didn't know that the word meant something different in Star Wars.
And yes I have.
Why does being a scoundrel excuse not having the option to shoot from a speeder?
One of the definitions of scoundrel is "A wicked or evil person; someone who dies evil deliberately." Bounty hunters can be scoundrels too.
If Key was an actual scoundrel it would've made the game much more entertaining. The unconfident scrawny teenager Kay is now doesn't fit in with the outlaw world at all.
Why do you assume that any bad review is from someone who hasn't played the game? People are allowed to have negative opinions just as much as people are allowed to have positive ones.
Just because you are enjoying the game doesn't mean that everyone else has to too.
Why the fuck theme it around bounty hunters then?
Jak and Daxter?