Mattador0808

joined 2 years ago
[–] Mattador0808 1 points 10 months ago

Don't worry friend. I got your office reference

[–] Mattador0808 2 points 1 year ago

I just recently watched on tubi

[–] Mattador0808 7 points 1 year ago

Finally. Someone calling those darned warmongering Democrats and praising the brave Republicans that tried so super duper hard to stand against the establishment. I salute you, brave keyboard warrior o7

I'm sure history will remember your bravery

[–] Mattador0808 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not surprising coming from the "work will set you free" crowd. Florida is trying it's hardest to be 1930s Germany and I truly feel bad for the sane residents being dragged along for the enevitable crash

[–] Mattador0808 16 points 1 year ago

No lowballs. I know what I got

[–] Mattador0808 2 points 1 year ago

And if your early, youre late by extension. Just run everywhere, I guess

[–] Mattador0808 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Big bus tycoons dot com

[–] Mattador0808 1 points 1 year ago

The lines themselves would be rays because they each have a starting point and no defined end. The direction of those rays would be the vectors which would be traveling 180 degrees in the opposite direction relative to their individual starting positions.

Of course, the example is flawed anyway for a number of reasons. But yes, you are correct. The "lines" are actually rays

[–] Mattador0808 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Two parallel lines can coexist on a plane heading in opposite directions (vectors) without being the same line. They are traveling 180 degrees relative to the other line's vector, not a fixed point on one of the lines

[–] Mattador0808 31 points 1 year ago (5 children)

That's disgusting... one of those pure filth instances!? Which one?