Mathazzar

An economy is only as healthy as the money that moves through it.

Stimulus bills when passed are exactly for that - put money into the hands of workers so that the economy can become healthy.

A corporation is always going to be moving money whether through investments, orders, etc.

A worker may not be able to. If the choice is between food, shelter, healthcare, etc.. then the worker is going to have to prioritize. Stories of workers having to choose to be late on some bills so they can afford shelter and food are not uncommon because wages have stagnated but corporations chase the green line going up on their graphs.

Without workers bring able to move money through the economy via wages to them, corporations just collect those assets and sit on them or invest them elsewhere. I don't think grocery stores are the places banks invest into.

Grocery stores will increase prices to keep that green graph line going up.

Basically, inflation is going to happen. Purchasing power moves over time. If wages don't keep up, things start breaking down economically.

I mean.. he won that one. I'd congratulate him on a well played feint as I died from lack of care.

I'll probably regret this but..

There is a difference between "please delist things telling people to drink bleach to cure covid" and "remove this negative story of the government or else"

This kind of harkens back to the idea of shouting fire in a crowded theater. Misinformation, specifically about pandemics, or alluding threats against officials, can lead to a much larger issue.

Even Kavanaugh states that it is not uncommon for these requests to be denied by social media companies.

This does not cross into first amendment issues because the government is protesting the spread of misinformation, threats, or government secrets, but can very rarely compel something.

In your post, you mentioned Meta. Meta choosing to accept the government concerns is acceptable as Meta is a corporation enacting its own will. In particular, Meta chose to help stop the spread of misinformation in order to benefit society. Which sounds really wierd to say about Meta. It's the bare minimum, but still.

If you told Meta they aren't allowed to stop the spread of misinformation, you'd be then restricting the ability of a corporation to stop the spread of things such as hate speech, calls for violence, etc. Which a corporation could then be found liable for.

Meta as a corporation, has chosen to moderate that information, and users have agreed to that moderation when they chose to use Meta's platform.

I can see them replacing artists to Ai generate art assets like in-game posters, promotive material, concept art.. AI will have its uses, but I see them using it to fire the low hanging fruit like artists.

One game already replaced the voice actors for AI except when they needed a character to grunt. It's all downhill from here for a bit.

It depends. Self publishers on places like Amazon Kindle are probably making that choice themselves. They choose their own covers.

I understand a Self publisher has less financial resources but.. there's no good answer.

For large publishing firms, they have a choice. They pick books they think will do well and support it with cover art, marketing, etc.

When you have things like Fallout's TV series using AI art to market itself? That's a multi-billion dollar company. They can afford not to. I don't fault the writer for a book that a publisher forces AI onto, but as long as they stay with a publisher who openly forces them to use AI, I will hold my stance.

One bad apple ruins the bunch.

Cosby was the titular character. His actions reflect on everyone. The supporting cast and crew did good work and were paid (hopefully fairly) for it, and I hope their efforts will always be remembered but the work is also tainted now.

One thing I'm unsure of is if Cosby wrote any of the shows. If so, his creeping shadow gets worse because he's a hypocrite. If not, then it's unfortunate to the writers.

There will never be a black or white answer in this but I have to draw lines somewhere. I don't demonize the supporting cast, only the titular one.

The cast can and should denounce Cosby in cases like that but.. again, Apple and the bunch.

I don't separate them. To still partake in the art helps boost their popularity and their message.

I also can't claim to support a group while boosting their biggest antagonist. I also see this spreading into the AI area.

If I see authors using AI cover art, I blacklist them. AI voices for characters in games? I'll swerve. I can't claim to support a community of artists and then shoot them in the foot at first opportunity.

I mostly hated that the skill trees are still mostly % increases. Cyberpunk retooled their entire skill tree because of that.

It's a type of gameplay progression that just isn't that fun - but Bethesda loves it.

My only gripe with solo is that I preferred the EU version of his backstop. More in the imperial pilot thing.

But I had already accepted that there would be new canon.

Star Wars was always my favorite sci fi universe for so long..

Now with what Filoni and Disney has done with it, i just dunno any more. I feel lost. I loved Andor and Rogue One though, but apparently they aren't the most popular?

I always get excited when I see a new CnC tiberian sun trailer has dropped... but I should know better..

Weirdly, I had a save corruption caused by selling a ship I stole. After new Atlantis broke, whenever I would go through a load screen my char customization would randomize. Sometimes I'd be a woman, sometimes a man. It was a wild time.