Mardukas

Please open a book. Remember: it only counts if it contains more sentences than pictures.

The God's what?

Please elaborate

The article contains a number of what seems to be assurances from different groups that this was unplanned and a behaviour not representative of these people as a group. It's notable, however, that multiple people seem to have been able to sing along.

Yes but appdata subfolder is local, locallow or roaming so the poster above you is still correct.

This really is the worst possible example of a person to highlight. You really should be ashamed of yourself. Yes the man rose from hell but he was a mass murderer with no regard for anyone but himself.

We shouldn't jump to conclusions

Immediately jumps to conclusions

Of course everything shouldn't be banned but everything does not lead to incurable diseases either. Working with things this dangerous and which provides no actual benefit for society is not worth regulating, consider who would pay for it.

Edit: It should also be noted that current evidence does not point towards there being a safe level of exposure to this dust. Any regulation must therefore be incredibly strict. Even if we disregard taxes, most of the economic pressure due to these regulations would befall the small businesses that cut these countertops. The large manufacturers of these materials would still be able to rake in profits while the little man pays for all the negatives.

The article states that an image was uploaded to X which seemed to imply that US foreign policy resulted in what is currently happening in Gaza, whereas Chinese policy leads to the current prosperity in Xinjiang. Which is quite a frightening comparison.

These arguments read like there is no problem with abestos as long as the right precautions are made. It's not like these countertops are en essential right of the people, especially given the risk.

These solutions would require strong regulations which, in the end, would only lead to the protection of profits for the large companies that sell them at the expense of taxpayer money. If we want to save taxpayer money and lives, prohibiting the use of these materials given their risk will be much more cost effective for society.

It's a gooseberry