So only the American government can sell Lockheed martin arms? Then the corporation is no longer liable for any harm their weapons cause since they have no power or agency in how they are used. Are you really sure you know your position here?
Malek061
joined 2 years ago
So corporations backed by tax dollars get to sell to anyone?
Weapons can be used for liberation or oppression at the same time. Lockheed doesn't get to say who they sell to.
Lockheed martin makes HIMARS. HIMARS is saving ukraine lives. That's a good thing.
If Shaq took hormone blockers, would she still have an advantage?
I'm pretty sure we were talking about walking down the street safety and sexual violence. Both if which are well within the boundaries of an argument. You can't just say "herring" and "rambling" and claim to make a great point.
Herring? Don't bring fish into this.
There is a higher chance of being mauled by a pitbull than being violently sexually assaulted on the streets of America yet there is a large portion of people that say it's not the breed, it's how they were raised.
Why aren't men talked about with similar empathy? Why don't we acknowledge there are more women pedophiles recieve lighter sentences and sometimes aren't convicted at all? Do you have empathy for these children?
Not as much as you when you're walking down the street.
Yes. Let's allow the authoritarians win. Dumbasses.
I'm saying all people have a rape problem. Just the link you gave where a couple raped a girl. I'm also saying America has a low walking down the street rape problem compared to India, South Africa, and Botswana.
Wow. It is more unethical to not manufacture weapons leaving your society completely defenseless. Don't know what planet you live on , but bad people exist and they seek to do harm and must be stopped with weapons. You can't tell them to go away with rainbows and lollipops like you seem to think.