Macros

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Example from Networking Hardware:

Cisco has had multiple cases where they likely built exploits for Government spyware into their devices. And they have far to many vulnerabilities which are found. This leaves two options: Either their security is so bad that intelligence always has backdoors ready and governments shouldn't use them, or at least some are backdoors built in accordance to NSA demands and goverments shouldn't use them. https://thehackernews.com/2016/08/nsa-hack-exploit.html?m=1

On the other hand Huawei, far less security issues, even offered to open their code for checking of backdoors and to let goverments check all updates. They are shunned by western governments and partially even banned.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Have a funny memory with this game. Got it for Christmas, played a bit, showed it to my brother and we played a game against each other.

A hour later I come trumphant into my brothers room: "I won!" "No, I am winning! See?" And indeed he was.

The game had somehow lost synchronisation, but it transferred just enough to let each player seem alive to the other one. Two happy players that day :)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And where do maintainers for the new parts of systemd come from? The larger systemd grows the more parts of it will be neglected. Also in regard to people checking commits, opening up doors for exploits like the one in xz.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

This is handled in the modem Firmware. Linux just has to supply "User has dialed number x, go into emergency mode" and then route the audio.

This is solved for all Linux phones as far as I know. From Openmoko over N900 till Librem 5.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Zu der Geschichte von damals nur ganz kurz, dass der Beschuldigte damals hinter dem Rücken des Vorstands die Wahlunterlagen selbst eingereicht hat und somit nicht mehr von der Liste geschmissen werden konnte. (Alle Details hier) Ich bin sehr froh, dass Patrick Breyer es dennoch reingeschafft hat. Er ist wirklich mein Traumpolitiker und wenn ich ehrlich bin: In die gewaltigen Fußstapfen wird wohl niemand mehr nachfolgen können. Gleichzeitig bin ich froh über jeden der es versucht.

Realistischerweise erreichen wir ein Mandat, das stimmt. Dafür braucht man nur etwas mehr als 0,6% der Stimmen. Für zwei sind es dann schon 1,5% (Ja das Wahlsystem ist wieder mal komisch). Richtig freuen würde ich mich wenn es sogar Lukas auf Platz drei reinschafft. Er macht schon länger Praktikum bei Patrick.

Ein Wiki Artikel wäre toll. Mit dem deutschen Wikipedia ist das nicht so einfach: Relevanzkriterien. Person -> Politiker -> International: Muss schon im Parlament sein oder gewesen sein. Den Vorteil haben nur alte Hasen und Patrick wird sich verdiente Zeit für seine Familie nehmen.

Einen ersten Einruck von Anja Hirschel kannst du beim Profil der Piratensicherheitskonferenz bekommen: https://events.pirate-secon.net/speakers-2/anja_hirschel/

Aber du hast recht ich stoß an, dass Anja ein Profil in unserem Wiki gemacht wird. In zwei drei Wochen findest du sie dann auch bei Abgeordnetenwatch und kannst sie da mit Fragen löchern ;)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Disclaimer: ich bin selber bei den Piraten, aber nur Basisgurke

Schau dir doch einfach mal an, was Patrick Breyer im EU Parlament so alles erreicht hat zur aktuellen Amtsperiode. Wenn du auf dem Newsportal deiner Wahl nach ihm suchst solltest du einiges finden. Die breite Presse stürzt sich halt gern auf persönliche Sachen, gute Politik ist da eher ein Nebensatz und der Name Piratenpartei fällt dann in den Artikeln teils nicht mal mehr.

Ein Beispiel: Breyer hat die Sperrminorität gegen die Chatkontrolle organisiert (auch wenn das Thema leider noch nicht ganz vom Tisch ist) und hat auch erstmals auf das Thema aufmerksam gemacht. Nebenbei veröffentlicht er als einer der sehr wenigen (als einziger?) Politiker im EU Parlament alle Treffen mit Lobbybezug, damit man immer Transparent mitverfolgen kann wer Einfluss auszuüben versucht.

Die Nachfolger Anja Hirschel und Lukas Küffner kenne ich persönlich und kann für beide bürgen.

Über die Jahre haben die Piraten immer nur gute Politik gemacht, aller Presse zum Trotz. Deswegen unterstütze ich sie auch gern weiter.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Rank ist bezogen auf einzelne Speicherriegel, der muss es unterstützen und das Bios.

Channel ist bezogen auf die gleichzeitig genutzten Speicherriegel. Abhängig vom Mainboard kannst du Dual Channel oder Quad Channel nutzen, das fordert dann entsprechend viele Speicherriegel.

Generell ist wichtig, die Speichersticks richtig einzusetzen, damit man Dualchannel nutzen kann. Siehe Mainboard Handbuch. Aber die Gewinne werden schnell kleiner, schon Quad Channel bringt bei vielen Anwendungen praktisch nix gegenüber Dual Channel oder einen Dual Rank Riegel. Deswegen können einige Consumermainboards auch mit vier RAMriegeln nur Dual Channel.

Im Serverbereich gibt es auch Octorank RAMriegel und Quad und mehr Channel.

Mehr hochgetaktete Speichersticks sind generell besser als wenige mit hohem Rank.

Quelle z.B. https://www.igorslab.de/performance-geheimtipp-fuer-gamer-arbeitsspeicher-ranks-in-theorie-und-praxis-mit-cyberpunk-2077/ (und weitere Infos)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

In honesty I didn't hear all his statements back then. Now from a quick search I can only find his Twitter:

„Natürlich kann es so gewesen sein, wie es @derspiegel annimmt. Es kann aber auch anders gewesen sein. Ich habe als Rechtsanwalt häufig erlebt, dass alles gegen A sprach, es war dann aber doch B.“

Which just says there should be more investigation before accusations are made. Asking for evidence. If you have a link to an interview or talk where he does as you said I would be interested to hear how he phrased it.

I want to point out one thing I have seen far to often in recent times: If a person or group of the left make a wrong statement others which previously followed them are quick to change their view and declare them as persona non grata. On the other hand we have the far right which spills out lies after lies and their followers are so used to it that even disproving them in multiple points does not touch their loyality in any way. I think we should focus more on welcoming people who try to do good thing. If they make a wrong step we should not shun them but try to show them why they did wrong. At least hey try to better themselves and you/we have a good chance to convince them of the better way.

See for example Snowden. He made the mistake to believe Russia would never invade Ukraine. An easy mistake if you have to live inside Russia propaganda machine. Upon realizing his error he was so struck by it, because he uses his social media reach to better the world and now trough a mistake he abused it for spreading propaganda, that he apologized and stopped tweeting for many months.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (5 children)

This is generally true, but there are also many notable exceptions. Here in Germany I could name:

  • Gregor Gysi
    • Of the left Party
    • Always does what he thinks is best for the people
    • Many political opponents tried really hard to stick dirt on him and failed
  • Nico Semsrott
    • Arguably not that long in politics
    • Took a stance against Martin Sonnenborn (who is the very popular leader of a satirical party) in an affair and is now without a party (Yes this makes it likely he will not be in the next parliament)
    • As far as I have seen votes always in favor of the people
  • Patrick Breyer -Pirate Party
    • fights for digital freedom and privacy since decades
    • Always follows the pirate paradigm: transparency. He publishes all his meeting with lobbyists.
    • Helps to educate the public and discovered quite a few hidden legislative attempts to undermine privacy
[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Ivanti Connect Secure VPN

So its spreading via a closed source VPN software. Why should you even use that when there is great VPN software available on Linux which works reliable for decades?

Well of course you miss zero trust connections, multi-cloud readiness, award‑winning security and proven secure corporate access ...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Interesting. For the Nokia N900 there is Maemo Leste which also uses mainline Linux (+ a few patches they are working to mainline) and there everything works. Mind that works means in this case: Does what I want if I issue a number of console commands. However most of it by now even works via the GUI.

Keep in mind that Leste is a project by a few enthusiasts and writing drivers for undocumented hardware is a monumental task, writing GUI for a whole mobile OS is also complicated. So it is utterly astonishing, how far they got!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

The point is, they already did. 99% of webservers run Linux. They are all out in the open and hackers love to get their hand on them as they are likely to have mailservers on them and they have a public IP so they can always be reached.

And most of them do not get hacked. And those that do mostly get hacked due to bad passwords or bad website code. I administer one and see the thousands of attacks running up against it daily (most are just attempts to log in with basic credentials). And of course I see the daily influx of updates from Linux.

If a new security flaw is seen, its often quite difficult to use. And with Linux somebody makes a patch before simple tool for hackers are out. With Microsoft products you wait till the next patch day, in the best case critical exploited bugs are patched in days. Also security flaws in closed source products are often easier to exploit and tools to use them are available fast. (Such flaws are often already discovered in open source products by third eyes and testers before they make it to production systems.)

Of course there are exceptions to the rule, like heartbleed. This was an easy to exploit flaw in an often used Linux service and it caused a big turmoil because many where to slow to patch their systems.

Also of course if Linux gets more popular on the desktop more software will be an attractive target for malicious actors and some software may get popular before many people take a look at the source code. But the situation will still be much better compared to closed source systems.

(Also of course more closed source software will be made for Linux then)

view more: ‹ prev next ›