JATtho

joined 2 years ago
[–] JATtho 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I actually don't have a exceptional physical strenght/fitness, and a 1km walk is too long. I honestly have no idea why I have this "issue", and it worries me. I mosty sit programming and watching Youtube, so either the brain or the occacional heavy use of legs burns it all. (I burnt 2kg of my weight while on a festival this year... Drinking beer and electrolytes.. And my 2nd priority was to eat there. o__O)

[–] JATtho 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They are 10y behind, I discovered thinking while 12y old and have been igoring it for 20y. Comes handy in a pinch, leaving all others mindblown.

[–] JATtho 4 points 6 months ago (4 children)

What do you mean? I'm actually worried of my cookie, cheese wheel and bun supply isn't enough... Gotta eat more, the cells ain't happy.

[–] JATtho 10 points 6 months ago (8 children)

I have an unusual problem, and i'm too light for my height. The weird is that I'm already eating butter, cheese, cookies, pizza etc. All the guilty calories. (Except icecream which I somehow don't like wtf.) So i'm on a quest to pound more. I somehow just burn it all puff - gone, on top of eating a meal twice a day.

[–] JATtho 4 points 6 months ago

Basic science knowledge why water is not-so-good idea on lithium-fires:

  • Lithium oxidizes the air alone and can self-ignite.
  • It is one of the few metals that can react with Nitrogen (N2) and CO2 in the air. So it will continue to react even if all oxygen is depleted from the fire.
  • Water + Lithium => Hydrogen => kaboom.

This means you have a "two-legged fire triangle" situation. The only way to stop the fire is to cool it down with something that it doesn't react with (sand), since you can't entirely remove the surrounding air. So the best option is really to just bury the thing in a sand pile.

The fact there is a ton of energy charged in a battery pack basically ensures all of the lithium will react if the battery shorts. If you ever see one puffing or rapidly heating up, you have maybe 5 seconds left to yeet the battery or the scene.

[–] JATtho 2 points 6 months ago

Bookmarking doesn't work for me, too limited, and starts a horrible trend of duplicating them. So they are useless for tab history managment. Also, the linear tab history is not very useful... same problem, the entries get duped eventually. I often don't want to restore the tabs from the last day whatever, but restore an specific set of tabs. Some times even multiple sets, and switch between these.

I really would like an Firefox feature, where the tabs would be part of a "tab history tree". Opening a link in a tab would add it as a "sub-tab" of the parent tab. In history.

So when a doing a search or refining one many times, this would end-up linking all the opened tabs to the originating tab. A new tree of tabs could be started by just opening an empty tab, and a "tab organizer UI" should allow to move/group that into an existing tab tree if needed. (The tab-bar UI doesn't need to visualize the tree-of-tabs. The tabs would be just auto-organized this way in the history)

I think this would allow to clear all of the currently open tabs in any window, but the tabs could still be neatly restored from the history on per-tree basis in any window. Restoring a tab-tree would allow to continue making refinements to it, or clone it. Currently multi-window tab restoring in FF is kinda borked, and only the last window's open tabs are restored automatically.

/end-of-wordsoup-for-today.

[–] JATtho 4 points 6 months ago

Yes, It's horrible, and can lead to minimizing any responsibilities you have. Even if you consciously want to accept a new responsibility/task, and have pre-planned how to do it well; Yet, you'll struggle to keep the promise to yourself. Self-blame will only make it worse.

Near the deadline the brain has (at best) already done all the work subconsciously, and you only to manifest the thing into reality. Don't doubt this, trashing the subconscious work is the worst thing you can do to yourself in a such situation.

(I'm not 100% sure I'm talking about the same subject, but anyway.)

[–] JATtho 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What I actually agree with the nukes is the insanity of only 3% burnup of the nuclear fuel. It could be way over that with fuel breeding. Yet that 3% burnup contains so much energy a plant can run 6kk to a year before they need to do any fuel shufling. So the fuel is cheap, but operating the plant is not. The safety standard and buerocracy is too high due to the fear mongering which is currently self-reinforcing. (Thought I wish no more PWRs would be needed, since if one pops it'll be an another fukushima. Nervously looking at OL3 5GW thermal/1.6GW that thing is way too big of a unit)

[–] JATtho 1 points 6 months ago

Expanding your brain by 20% might not go well... that's extra 20% to worry about.

[–] JATtho 5 points 6 months ago

You mean cessation of lower entropy?

view more: ‹ prev next ›