I didn't want to read this article, and couldn't find a video about this article about a video from the media about how the media is spending too much time covering trump, but here is the original video that is about how the media is spending too much time covering trump that this article is about.
Edit: for clarity sake, that link is just to the Jon Stuart video that this article is talking about.
Yeah, Payne was quite the significant individual. I would say most, if not all, books on bioacoustics that I've come across have had sections on him and his work with whales. His wife, Katy Payne, comes up quite a bit as well, she worked with him on whales, but also has done quite a bit of research on elephant communication as well.
Enjoy the book! I'm due for a reread of it for sure. It's a great reminder that the reality that we experience is so much through the lenses of our specific senses, and not at all an objective reality.
Thanks so much for the recommendation! I really enjoyed reading this. Here is a copy of my comment that I posted over there:
What a fascinating read! I really appreciate you sharing it. Ed Yong has a great book, An Immense World, all about various types of animal senses, and in the chapter on sound, he talks about this very owl. I was surprised when reading your post that it was Roger Payne's work, but upon reviewing the chapter in An Immense World I saw that it was, in fact, him. I am familiar with Payne from his work with whales, many people credit him and his work with humpback whales songs as the reason that neatly the whole world has stopped whaling. With good reason, he produced an album of whale songs that changed the way the world saw them.
Ed Yong's book is incredible, and I highly recommend it, he goes into detail about the senses we are generally acustomed to, but also some more uncommon ones like electro-reception. Here are a couple interesting bits from the section where he writes about the remarkable hearing of owls.
A great gray owl can pluck a lemming from within its snow-covered tunnel or accurately bust through the roof of a gopher burrow, solely by listening to the chewing or scurrying sounds coming from beneath the ground. These feats are remarkable, and they hint at why hearing can be such a useful sense.
...
But hunting by sound has one ma jor disadvantage-interference. A vissually guided predator like an eagle doesn't emit light when it moves, but an owl can't help but make noise with its own wingbeats. Those noises, which are close to the owl's ears, could potentially drown out the faint and distant sounds of its prey. Fortunately, the owl has soft feathers on its body and serrated edges on its wings that make its flight almost imperceptibly quiet. The noise it does make is mostly below the range to which its ears are most sensitive and below the lower limit of what small rodents can hear.
So generally, an animal's hearing pretty much overlaps with the frequencies of sound that it makes, but in this case it is an advantage to not be tuned to the frequency that the owl's own features makes. I believe it was elsewhere in this same book where Ed Yong talks about a bird that is unable to hear it's own song, the thought being that this particular bird's insect prey was able to hear the sound and this somehow aided in hunting. I don't remember the specifics, and if memory serves, it's not entirely known why it would be like this.
The chapter goes on to mention that barn owl's are not even the animal with the best hearing like this. There is a fly that is specifically tuned to the sound of male crickets:
Most tachinids track their victims through sight or smell, but Ormia ochracea-a yellow, half-inch-long species that's found throughout the Americas, uses sound. Like female crickets, it listens out for the song of a male. Homing in on those dulcet thrrrrps, it lands either on or near the singer and deposits maggots. These burrow into the cricket and slowly devour him from within.
He says that the Ormia can detect the position of a cricket to 1 degree. The Ormia is so efficient that it has actually led to some male crickets evolving out of using mating songs and leaving the females of the species to have to find males just by stumbling across them.
What a fascinating read! I really appreciate you sharing it. Ed Yong has a great book, An Immense World, all about various types of animal senses, and in the chapter on sound, he talks about this very owl. I was surprised when reading your post that it was Roger Payne's work, but upon reviewing the chapter in An Immense World I saw that it was, in fact, him. I am familiar with Payne from his work with whales, many people credit him and his work with humpback whales songs as the reason that neatly the whole world has stopped whaling. With good reason, he produced an album of whale songs that changed the way the world saw them.
Ed Yong's book is incredible, and I highly recommend it, he goes into detail about the senses we are generally acustomed to, but also some more uncommon ones like electro-reception. Here are a couple interesting bits from the section where he writes about the remarkable hearing of owls.
A great gray owl can pluck a lemming from within its snow-covered tunnel or accurately bust through the roof of a gopher burrow, solely by listening to the chewing or scurrying sounds coming from beneath the ground. These feats are remarkable, and they hint at why hearing can be such a useful sense.
...
But hunting by sound has one ma jor disadvantage-interference. A vissually guided predator like an eagle doesn't emit light when it moves, but an owl can't help but make noise with its own wingbeats. Those noises, which are close to the owl's ears, could potentially drown out the faint and distant sounds of its prey. Fortunately, the owl has soft feathers on its body and serrated edges on its wings that make its flight almost imperceptibly quiet. The noise it does make is mostly below the range to which its ears are most sensitive and below the lower limit of what small rodents can hear.
So generally, an animal's hearing pretty much overlaps with the frequencies of sound that it makes, but in this case it is an advantage to not be tuned to the frequency that the owl's own features makes. I believe it was elsewhere in this same book where Ed Yong talks about a bird that is unable to hear it's own song, the thought being that this particular bird's insect prey was able to hear the sound and this somehow aided in hunting. I don't remember the specifics, and if memory serves, it's not entirely known why it would be like this.
The chapter goes on to mention that barn owl's are not even the animal with the best hearing like this. There is a fly that is specifically tuned to the sound of male crickets:
Most tachinids track their victims through sight or smell, but Ormia ochracea-a yellow, half-inch-long species that's found throughout the Americas, uses sound. Like female crickets, it listens out for the song of a male. Homing in on those dulcet thrrrrps, it lands either on or near the singer and deposits maggots. These burrow into the cricket and slowly devour him from within.
He says that the Ormia can detect the position of a cricket to 1 degree. The Ormia is so efficient that it has actually led to some male crickets evolving out of using mating songs and leaving the females of the species to have to find males just by stumbling across them.
Fascinating read, thanks so much for sharing it! I think this is probably one of the most unexplored areas of bioacoustics. It seems like there is so much potential for agricultural applications with this.
Similarly to what is described in this article, coral reef health is also being monitored based on acoustics. It is sometimes even taken a step further in that speakers are being used to play the sounds of healthy coral reefs in order to attract fish and coral larvae to struggling reefs. I wonder if this is something that is also being explored with soil.
So many of the chemicals and pesticides that are used in agriculture are applied in places that the insects they are designed to defend against are not even there, simply because they don't know exactly where the pests are. Acoustic monitoring could potentially reduce the amount they use by a massive amount. On top of this, however, audio could possibly be played that dettered certain pests from going certain places, or audio that encourages them to go places other than to crops, we could potentially see pesticides being replaced by a combination of real-time monitoring and sound generation.
Research Shows Baby Bird Development Harmed By Sound Of Cars