Hackerman_uwu

joined 2 years ago
[–] Hackerman_uwu 3 points 20 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago)

We literally are at the stage where when someone says: “this is a psyop” then that is the psyop. When someone says: “these drag queens are groomers” they are the groomers. When someone says: “the establishment wants to keep you stupid and poor” they are the establishment who want to keep you stupid and poor.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 2 points 1 week ago

Isn’t that the game?

[–] Hackerman_uwu 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I think I got the nuance behind 'bigoted man I disagree with is actually a woman because women amirite?'.

Nope.

It goes like this: ‘bigoted man is bigoted because this will aggravate his orange tits. If bigoted man was not bigoted it would not be possible to rip on him like this.’

Put another way: ‘I am a bigot, said John.’

If that doesn’t clarify it then I’m out of patience to explain further.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 1 points 2 weeks ago (37 children)

It isn’t tolerating misogyny, it’s pointing out misogyny and ridiculing misogynists.

It’s OK if you don’t like how that’s being done, and it’s OK if you can’t understand the nuance but policing my speech unchallenged is not what is going to happen.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Frankly I think you’ve put it better than I did.

That’s exactly what the joke is about.

The punchline is: ‘they are bigots’, not: ’fuck trans people and women’.

Appreciate you.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Cool the don’t do it. Are you able to do that while not alienating people who share your views perhaps? That’d be great.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 8 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

They are not just jokes. People posting these things are doing so specifically to antagonise the right.

I’m telling you that your concern trolling is alienating allies.

I have chosen to engage in this just like you chose to deal with the blowback when you posted it.

All I have done to “fight for trans rights” is to speak out when I can, challenge bigotry as I am challenging you right now, stand up and be counted at queer marches/events and raise a daughter who took the only trans kid in her high school to prom.

You don’t know my life and that isn’t the discussion. Stop deflecting and learn to focus on intent.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 17 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

Because those terms will not aggravate trump. The intent is to aggravate trump not denigrate femininity. Focus ffs. This isn’t about insulting trans people or women, it’s about fighting back on someone who is trying to hurt them. We will struggle to maintain allies if we cannot focus on the speakers intent and not a willing misinterpretation of their words.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

“Horseshoe theory” is a straw man attempt to defang the left.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (50 children)

The intent is to say something that will antagonise Trump. The intent is not to demean women.

Attacking someone who shares your moral platform because you purposefully misinterpret their words to suit a separate agenda is friendly fire.

Transphobia and misogyny are not to be tolerated, do you really think that someone attacking turnip (autocorrect, I’m leaving it) online doesn’t share your views on this?

Stip trying to police speech among your allies. Focus on intent. Stop with the nonsense infighting we are at war rn.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 1 points 3 weeks ago

Ah yes. Wet roads cause rain.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 5 points 1 month ago

Not sure if this is an age thing but at a certain point I just stopped wanting “forever fixes”. Nothing is forever. You’re just patching in the hopes that the nex hole is easier to patch now that you have all the shit you need to do patches.

-33
Power drunk mods (self.fediverse)
submitted 1 year ago by Hackerman_uwu to c/fediverse
 

So after a run in with a moderator yesterday I’ve had some thoughts I felt I wanted to share.

I won’t name them here, you are welcome to look at my comment history and make up your own mind.

In this instance a user posted some misinformation. I don’t think they intended to, they merely perpetuated a myth, they clearly simply knew no better.

I tried to respond diplomatically, they doubled down, other users piled on, the downvotes are plenty and then I responded with an article citing evidence supporting my assertions.

I also stated that the burden of proof lies with the claimant and asked for some context on why they seemed dead set on the lie they were aping back, asking if they subscribe to other myth based beliefs, religions, etc. That post was unceremoniously deleted with no notice to me and no reasons given… until the user pointed out in another post that they are the sole mod of the community and warned me that they were “not afraid to ban” me should I “cross the line” in a very *‘I’m the sheriff of this here town’ *tone. Which gave me a chuckle.

That’s my side of the story, it’s all there if you want to draw your own conclusions. It really doesn’t matter who is right or wrong in a ‘someone is wrong on the internet’ spat but I did spot a chink in the fediverse through this incident.

The real point here is that this kind of behaviour is one of things that made Reddit fucking awful and I’d hate to see it flourish here in the fediverse.

I don’t have the solutions just some suggestions that I’d be keen to hear others opinions on:

  1. No moderation without representation. IOW: mods should be democratically elected.
  2. Mod elections should be annual and no mod should enjoy that status for life.
  3. There should be a mechanism for inducing a ‘no confidence’ mode election at any time otherwise the communities are likely to splinter into “real_” communities just as they did on Reddit which no community in the fediverse can currently afford.

What say you my brothers and sisters and everything in between? Is there a way to safeguard against cronyism, corruption and other frailties of the human ego?

view more: next ›