Hackerman_uwu

joined 1 year ago
[–] Hackerman_uwu 1 points 1 day ago

Since we are explaining things: an onion, like an apple is a fruit.

[–] Hackerman_uwu -3 points 1 week ago

No one wants to hear it - that’s often a good sign it’s right on the money.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 17 points 3 weeks ago

I consult in some companies that don’t even allow copy/paste in outlook. Like, these are actually MS security policies that can be set.

How in all of the actual fucks could they allow MS to see everything on your screen.

I agree with your non starter assessment.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The rework is titled: ‘Enter sockman’.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 5 points 3 weeks ago

Laughs in warming the carbs on my pre-2000s motorcycle while holding out the choke.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 5 points 3 weeks ago

The dangerous thing here is that he’s using his influence, fame and resources to normalise being a chronic fuckhead, and it’s likely going to work.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 29 points 4 weeks ago (13 children)

Fuck is a “woke dei”?

[–] Hackerman_uwu 1 points 1 month ago

Oh they got it.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 0 points 1 month ago

Sure. I definitely do not disagree about the price but I wish you’d made it about that and not the art. Have a good Friday!

[–] Hackerman_uwu 2 points 1 month ago

All extremely valid points, I’ll be getting mine thanks.

[–] Hackerman_uwu 2 points 1 month ago

Oh come off it.

-34
Power drunk mods (self.fediverse)
submitted 10 months ago by Hackerman_uwu to c/fediverse
 

So after a run in with a moderator yesterday I’ve had some thoughts I felt I wanted to share.

I won’t name them here, you are welcome to look at my comment history and make up your own mind.

In this instance a user posted some misinformation. I don’t think they intended to, they merely perpetuated a myth, they clearly simply knew no better.

I tried to respond diplomatically, they doubled down, other users piled on, the downvotes are plenty and then I responded with an article citing evidence supporting my assertions.

I also stated that the burden of proof lies with the claimant and asked for some context on why they seemed dead set on the lie they were aping back, asking if they subscribe to other myth based beliefs, religions, etc. That post was unceremoniously deleted with no notice to me and no reasons given… until the user pointed out in another post that they are the sole mod of the community and warned me that they were “not afraid to ban” me should I “cross the line” in a very *‘I’m the sheriff of this here town’ *tone. Which gave me a chuckle.

That’s my side of the story, it’s all there if you want to draw your own conclusions. It really doesn’t matter who is right or wrong in a ‘someone is wrong on the internet’ spat but I did spot a chink in the fediverse through this incident.

The real point here is that this kind of behaviour is one of things that made Reddit fucking awful and I’d hate to see it flourish here in the fediverse.

I don’t have the solutions just some suggestions that I’d be keen to hear others opinions on:

  1. No moderation without representation. IOW: mods should be democratically elected.
  2. Mod elections should be annual and no mod should enjoy that status for life.
  3. There should be a mechanism for inducing a ‘no confidence’ mode election at any time otherwise the communities are likely to splinter into “real_” communities just as they did on Reddit which no community in the fediverse can currently afford.

What say you my brothers and sisters and everything in between? Is there a way to safeguard against cronyism, corruption and other frailties of the human ego?

view more: next ›