There also aren't a lot of totalitarian governments that cease their tyranny because the opposing populace hold peaceful protest. Eventually, prospects will become better only when the institution burns.
That said, I don't relish the thought of tearing down an institution that people rely on for personal stability and safety, but if the system's malicious actions outweigh the good that said system does passively, then the only option, the last option, is violence.
TCG rules but...
Only 3 benched pokemon
No prize cards, 3 points to win
energy is free at 1/turn
Packs contain 5 non energy cards, you get 2/day for free
What's so confusing?
No, because some States have entrenched parties that wish to stay entenched. And since we're 50 countries in a trench coat, nothing will change about that soon unless you live there and enjoy making gasoline cocktails.
This, except that the foundations that lead to change are laid on election night. Yes the cement was mixed and the scaffolding raised, but today sets the tools we have to work with to enact that change for the next 4 (or rarely 2) years.
You have such a toxic view of the world. I hope things get better for you.
Lmao you sit in a bubble you create with your own rage in paranoia. To bounce it back at you, "by all means" do nothing by measure of strategy or reason. By shaking your fist at fellow Americans you are certainly solving genocide. Congratulations, you won. No more genocide because you frothed at the mouth with such zeal that you get an aneurysm by 40.
Avoiding the abuse by not participating causes more suffering. Your logic does not carry.
Oops! You missed the disclaimer: *of all participants polled, including only individuals who opted in to the poll, on this specific website or streetside polling campus, during these specific hours in the day.
Edit: Apologies if any of this was misleading. I only meant to point out that polls often have hidden implicit biases due to the nature of their process.
Welcome to automated warfare. Imagine a mass-cas squad engagement and after the shooting stops you realize the shooter was safe in a bunker a mile away.
You claim to be looking for a good faith argument but you'll only respond to the poster being hostile to you. The cognitive dissonance is about expected, but no one is stopping you from claiming this hill of assumptions as your moral highground.
Just to be clear, it's the media's fault I've had back-to-back panic attacks about whether or not I'll have rights in 3mo? Sick...