That's why we've already seen breakthroughs in reactors that use nuclear waste for fuel.
Fazoo
joined 11 months ago
I saw this show on Broadway and would not classify it as family friendly or aimed at kids. 90s cartoons were more subtle in their cussing and sexual comments. Fantastic show I would recommend again and again.
That does not justify what they did though. She may rock the dress, but take your horny selves home. Classic GOP hypocrisy.
You know they're doping though. Kinda ruins the fun.
Hahahaha, pro-Russian group calling people puppets? That's a good one. Good luck on gaining a single seat in government next election.
I don't know why I bother clicking these links. It's always one of the same three videos. Lol
My thoughts exactly. Not earning enough? Improve your lifestyle or career.
Correct, the Soviets launched the first basic satellite. They haven't accomplished much since the 70s though and none of it translated to the commercial market. I won't knock them for having a solid system that could fill the gap post-shuttles. Their adversion to solid fuel rockets also has merit.
The commercial market is the public market. Not sure why I'd have to explain that level of importance.
The motivation was to make a profit by making them affordable. Efficiency was the key Ford recognized as his means to success. If there is no profitability, he would never have bothered in bucking the current system.
You're putting the cart before the horse.
BBC Arabic performing a staggering amount of mental gymnastics attempting to justify that opinion. What's even the goal? Excusing radical Islamic bombings because "The Jews did it first!"??
Except there are ways to use the waste as fuel. So no, not some "capitalist bullshit". Just a problem with a solution.