A single number per ad campaign of how many times an ad view resulted in a visit or purchase.
Mozilla's announcement about it explains it pretty well: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/privacy-preserving-attribution
Eylrid
joined 2 years ago
Why did I read that headline and think Jupiter was causing trouble
The Doctor is on first
Horton Hears a Who if Horton was the one saying "Boil that dust speck! Boil that dust speck!"
More important than who works there is who inherits Gabe's ownership of the company. A new owner can completely change a company and drive out or fire anyone who doesn't go along with the new direction. Look at what happened with twitter when Musk took over. Or his inheritors could take Valve public and introduce all the issues with that.
On the case of chips
He doth protest too much
Mee, mee, meemee!
Bit hypocritical of the US when they themselves recently passed a divest-or-ban law against a speech platform citing foreign influence and also uses police to violently disrupt protests
It's both, really. It amplifies everything, both good and bad. There are a lot of amazing things that have come about because of the Internet, as well as a lot of awful shit. It's easy to overlook the good stuff and only see the shit.
It would depend on how rare the rarest endings are. If there are only a handful of copies of one of the endings and the handful of people that got it don't engage with the online fan community (not everyone who reads books are online about it), those people might not even know there are different endings, let alone that they have a rare one.
It's tracking how well ads perform without tracking individual users. Tracking ads isn't the problem. Tracking users is the problem. Before this the only way to track ad performance was by tracking users. This is a way to track ad performance without tracking users.