You've got a point. This can be a sign of something sinister. It's not necessarily a bad a sign but the situation that the previous user pointed out happens frequently enough that it could be.
I really don't get why someone would do this other than to play out some sort of sick fantasy. No one good ever destroys public utilities.
The purpose of a system is what it does.
I'm aware that's how they work but when the system "works" and the result is starving families then maybe it's time we rethink whether we should keep following this system, no?
I love that we need ironclad proof to decide whether or not it's okay for people to be able to afford sustenance or not. If there's no proof then, oh well! The poors will just have to make do.
I choose to believe the person that gave you 1 will bump into you again and say "now we're talking" before disappearing into a crowd.
He's making use of his depends.
It's really hard to take the "law" seriously when we constantly see rich people getting away with violating it.
Syndicalism is the only way.
Wouldn't it have been hilarious if that's what happened after the fact?
They take us for fools.
The image is formatted in a tweet with image format. The caption says "handle with care" over two pictures. The first picture is of an Amazon package with "fragile" written in sharpie. The second picture is on the inside the box with a paper and the text "a middle manager's ego" on it.
The image is a Bugs Bunny in a tuxedo with the text "I wish all everybody a very Henry Kissinger is dead"
view more: next ›
Aren't those the same thing?