No downforce will do that to you. It's the trade-off for the low drag they've gone for.
Coelacanth
joined 1 year ago
Great lap by Nando
Drying track is always fireworks for quali. I missed the pre show, what's the weather forecast for q2 and 3?
The worry about EEE is actually not my primary concern at the moment. And it's not data collection either, though I hate what Meta is doing there.
I'm not interested in Threads "content" on my front page here. And boy will it ever be all over the "All" page thanks to Threads users outnumbering all of the Fediverse by many magnitudes. The poor algorithm is not going to show you any new Lemmy content anymore with all the engagement Threads posts is going to get.
Then there are the comments in communities here. If you've felt happy that this community has better atmosphere and discussions than the dreg you'd be served on Reddit, just wait until we open the door for hundreds of millions of Facebook commenters.
I love the community that is building on Lemmy. If I wanted to participate in the community on Meta I'd be on Instagram or Facebook or Threads.
But I don't. That's why I'm here.
It's actually a pretty smart approach for a team with limited resources. Building efficient downforce is very hard. Building efficient low-drag is much easier. You will suck even harder at most tracks than if you'd tried making an all-rounder car, but so what? Finishing 14/15 is worth the same points as 19/20. Doing the the extreme low drag approach at least puts you in contention for points at tracks like Monza and those handfuls of points can be huge for a team at the bottom of the standings.
They have way more and better people working at the car now than they had during the Pink Mercedes days, so I don't think it's that simple.
The first place to look is money, I think - the budget cap. It's possible they spent a majority of their available development budget for the season over the winter just to get this platform ready.
Let's also look at RB's advantage and be realistic. From the start AM have said they want to be winning races in a couple of years, not this year. Considering the gap, trying to spend money on development for this year is honestly just wasteful. Nobody is going to catch Red Bull and if AM were actually trying to they'd be making a mistake.
All development should focus on next year and beyond. If any of that can be translated to upgrades that can be fitted immediately then great, but the only priority should be the future, as sad as that will be for the remaining races of this season.
Jerboa was unstable to the point of unusability when I first started using Lemmy but I'm checking it out again now and it seems to work at least. Not quite Boost though.
I've been using WefWef to tide me over but it's not what I'm looking for and it's missing a lot of stuff still.
EDIT: Jerboa is still extremely unstable and in addition to crashing it suddenly thought I was not logged in while refusing to let me log in. It's the most Boost like interface but for now I'm sticking to WefWef and also trying Liftoff.
You're right. Going down through the levels of "okay, and why?" works on a theoretical level but requires both the person asking the right why-question and a level of intellectual honesty from both parties that is incredibly hard to find.
It's not a bad approach for questioning your own beliefs though, if you can muster the strength to be honest with yourself.
I'm not a versus player but I'm glad they're getting some love for the sake of the health of the game long term.
Ranked versus and spectator mode has been long, long overdue.
Brother you've been running a Chrome livery all season with all those logos.
Also I'm not a McLaren fan but imagine being one and getting teased with the words "chrome livery" and then seeing this garbage. I know they can't just resurrect the Vodafone deal for one race but come on.
Waiting the whole season for Max to make a single mistake and when it finally happens it's in a Q1 that doesn't matter