CodexArcanum

Stephanie Stirling has been beating the drum on fake "quality" modes that give you RT at the expense of everything else. Think it was this one but it might also have been this one.

You might be part of the problem, but you WILL be part of the solution!

Going into physics was the biggest mistake of my life. I should've declared CS. I still wouldn't have any women, but at least I'd be rolling in cash.

Honestly, there wasn't all that much cash to roll in and there's less all the time now. Plus, if you think busted equipment is bad, wait until I tell you about inheriting legacy code.

I don't know exactly how much code reuse Sawyer had going back then, but if you've ever played Transport Tycoon (or more likely the open source version around today, OpenTTD) then you know that the interface and graphics are extremely similar. So it's not like he started from scratch each game with nothing but a hot spinning disc and a magnetized needle.

But yeah, the main reason to put up with all the modern framework bloat is the ever-ephemeral promise of being able to write your thing once and have it ported to run anywhere with minimal to no further effort.

It's mot, the greatest haircut in Star Fleet,

this haircut is just a tribute.

Freudian autocorrect

This is why we love the Saints. Terrible at football but at least they know how to party after the game.

A lot of things seem obvious until someone questions your assumptions. Are these closed forms on the Euclidean plane? Are we using Cartesian coordinates? Can I use the 3rd dimension? Can I use 27 dimensions? Can I (ab)use infinities? Is the embedded space well defined, and can I poke a hole in the embedded space?

What if the parts don't self-intersect, but they're so close that when printed as physical parts the materials fuse so that for practical purposes they do intersect because this isn't just an abstract problem but one with real-world tolerances and consequences?

The "=" symbol defines an equivalence relation. So "1+1=2" is one definition of "2", defining it as equivalent to the addition of 2 identical unit values.

2*1 also defines 2. As does any even quantity divided by half it's value. 2 is also the successor to 1 (and predecessor to 3), if you base your system on counting (or anti-counting).

The youtuber Vihart has a video that whimsically explores the idea that numbers and operations can be looked at in different ways.

Around here, vinyl records and local record stores are still doing alright. There's at least 4 if them I know of, and they also sell some cds and tapes still. It is a little odd that no chain has tried to break into that space (or one of the megacorps like Time-WB trying to revitalize some deadmall brand like Sam Goodies.)

P

I