Cleverdawny

All of that is implied, dude

That's a lot of words which don't go to answer the question as to why the candidate has to answer for the supposed racism of one of his donors. I'm sure if we looked long enough we could find some donor of Bowman who has posted something calling for some nasty activities. But nobody does, because everyone understands that a politician isn't responsible for the views of individuals who happen to vote for him unless he has solicited their endorsement specifically and celebrated that endorsement publicly.

Without giving a reason? They're invaders. If they go home they won't be subject to killing.

Besides, is killing Russians a good thing?

Yes.

They're killing Russians, so their historical political leanings don't really matter.

It's just hilarious with Hunter

At this point I want Biden to appoint him as the ambassador to somewhere so he can do blow and hookers with some minor European politician

When Latimer said Bowman is an “ineffective Congressman” because he argues too much, Bowman interrupted to say that he is “passionate.”

But Latimer responded, “You need to talk to them as normal people — you can’t preach and scream at them on the steps of the Capitol.”

Jamaal Bowman is known as one of the more firebrand politicians out there. Running against that is fair game, and pretending fair criticism of him is racism seems dishonest as fuck to me.

Yes, the response to Israel doing something is indeed always more severe than when any other country does it.

As to war crimes, I've never seen any evidence of intentional targeting of civilians as a matter of policy. I've seen evidence of individual soldiers doing that, and that's happened in every war. It's why war is bad, and you shouldn't start wars.

There is not a single country on this planet which would tolerate an organization like Hamas remaining in power after an event like Oct 7.