ChemicalPilgrim

joined 1 year ago
[–] ChemicalPilgrim 1 points 1 year ago

So autocracies are better on environmental policy?

[–] ChemicalPilgrim 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I get what you're trying to do, but you should feel pretty gross about doing it this way.

[–] ChemicalPilgrim 5 points 1 year ago

Most of us can't afford treatment and have to make choices between adequate healthcare or having money for retirement/anything else.

[–] ChemicalPilgrim 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

AGI can't be worse at running things than a bunch of temperamental apes so let's go for it

[–] ChemicalPilgrim 2 points 1 year ago

Leave me alone WHO, always in my DMs

[–] ChemicalPilgrim 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Most people won't demand any of that if gas is cheap. It requires political will to get public transit built and funded.

[–] ChemicalPilgrim 9 points 1 year ago (23 children)

Increasing the price of carbon means people will have an incentive to stop generating so much of it. If it's free to put another ton of CO2 into the atmosphere many people won't think twice about doing it.

[–] ChemicalPilgrim 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ChemicalPilgrim 1 points 1 year ago

When the fork I use for lunch and throw away will outlast my civilization, I'm very much ok with destroying that technology.

[–] ChemicalPilgrim 38 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If we're not going to engage on social issues, the default outcome will be letting the right-wing culture warriors drag us back to 1800.

[–] ChemicalPilgrim 1 points 1 year ago

As an American who has waited a full workday in an emergency room for the privilege to then get a mystery bill that seems to be the product of a random number generator, don't privatize your healthcare.

view more: ‹ prev next ›