It biases the first repliers
BMTea
joined 2 months ago
You can though I like it.
The Atlantic is like the newspaper version of everything wrong with Democratic Party.
Liberalism across the West is a rotting carcass unfortunately. In 2000 the EU sanctioned Austria because an anti-refugee party got 52 seats in the National Congress. Today, that party has 57 seats and its view on refugees are basically what Kier Starmer and Van der Leyen believe.
In 2016 we mocked Trump's wall. In 2024 Kamala Harris says she will actually build it and chides him for not doing so.
There is no published science definitively proving that it is harmful or helpful. The effects of this particular legislation, if it is impactful at all, remains to be seen. I'm just offering my opinion based on my personal experiences. I expect it to have some success in reducing acute adolescent mental health issues. If the matter is ever settled through consensus, I'll defer to that.
Why not just look up how it actually works in the real world instead of hypotheticals
I support this move. Some here are delusionally arguing that this impacts privacy - the sort of data social media firms collect on teenagers is egregiously extensive regardless. This is good support for their mental health and development.
The Guardian's army of reporters visited the site of each and every explosion and verified they were indeed Hezbollah targets to bring you this 100% legit headline.
Elon Musk is a right-wing darling with appeal for both white nationalist types and libertarian deregulators. But no one can take over MAGA. Trump is top dog, to the degree that I have no clue what they'll do once he's gone from office.