Aphelion

joined 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Attacking someone personally over the dominant politics of the state the live plays perfectly into the hands of the conservative agenda. Keeps those leftys fighting each other while conservatives push their agenda on all of us with the coordination of unified force.

And by your own statement you are incorrect: if the state legislature and the federal representatives are overwhelmingly Republican, they already gerrymandered the whole state.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If you read the article, you'll learn that he was wrongfully arrested and the legal fees involved in clearing up the whole matter were pretty high.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago

The EPA has been left completely toothless by SCOTUS.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Oooh! Oooh! Can we have tigers attacking them too? And this will be in a giant arena right? Ancient Rome, LET'S GOOOO!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

If they do, it's pretty funny since .ml has been the only instance I've had comments removed from and they were a small joke and asking a legitimate question.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah yes, those incredibly fair and balanced mods in [email protected], who remove my small joke comment but let the tankies brigade the comment section with propaganda. Yeah, they're doing a great job.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Same. I'm patiently waiting for real sale on it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

I think you need to compare the greenhouse effect from methane as compared to that CO2, NOx and SOx released by burning off the methane. There is a reasone the EPA requires waste water treatment plants to flare off methane rather than freely releasing it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So if enough people in every state complained about SCOTUS to their state legislature, the state legislature can force the people's opinion up to the Governors who can do something at the federal level? I guess I'm just not seeing the actual legal mechanism that would be used to force any kind of change.

My understanding is any change to the structure of government at that level requires 2/3rds congressional majority.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Please give me a hypothetical example of how "the American people" can actually change the fundamental structure of the 3 branches of government. Like seriously, I would love to know how.

view more: ‹ prev next ›