AnarchoBolshevik

joined 5 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

The 1919 law established the minimum requirements for all white‐collar contracts, both on an individual basis, and, potentially, for collective agreements. This law was further amended in 1924 with decree‐law number 1825, and later converted into law 562 of 1926.^9^ Private sector white‐collar employment, therefore, saw substantial continuity between the Liberal Age and the fascist period — a continuity that found no correspondence in any other category of employment.

[…]

In collective bargaining, white‐collar workers represented a weak counterparty. They were unable to manifest adequate autonomous trade union strength and not particularly willing to ally themselves as a subordinate component with the workers’ movement, given that they could not identify with the latter’s prevalently class‐based values.

From these factors emerges one of the specific reasons for white‐collar interest in fascist trade unionism: the 1924 law confirmed and restructured for the better the minimum guarantees for private white‐collar workers, and the union laws of 1926^17^ established a new top‐down solution for collective bargaining and gave legal value to collective agreements. This solution best responded to the traditional needs and attitudes of the white‐collar class in general.

[…]

Overall, the industrialists behaved in the same way towards white‐collar workers as they had towards labourers, but following a formally contrary course. While the rapid establishment of contracts for manual labourers in the late 1920s had sanctioned a change in the balance of power, following the period of salary increases and regulatory victories of 1919–1920 (the ‘red biennial’), for white‐collar workers, it was the very absence of national contracts that allowed the erosion of the post‐war salary increases to take place.^28^

The Confederation of industrialists had also sought the abolishment of the white‐collar law of 1924, accusing it of being a product of class struggle and as such incompatible with the new régime^29^; this venture did not, however, meet with success.

(Emphasis added.)


Events that happened today (September 9):

1908: Shigekazu Shimazaki, Axis career officer, was born.
1936: The crews of Portuguese Navy frigate NRP Afonso de Albuquerque and destroyer Dão mutinied against the Salazar régime’s support of General Franco’s coup and declared their solidarity with the Spanish Republic.
1939: The Battle of Hel commenced, and became the longest‐defended pocket of Polish Army resistance during the Fascist invasion of Poland. (Coincidentally, Burmese national hero U Ottama starved in prison after a hunger strike to protest Britain’s colonial government.)
1940: The Hungarian Army perpetrated the Treznea Massacre in Transylvania.
1941: Hans Spemann, Fascist embryologist, expired.
1942: An Imperial floatplane dropped incendiary bombs on Oregon.
1943: The Allies landed at Salerno and Taranto, Italy. Coincidentally, Reich bombers killed the former Axis admiral Carlo Bergamini.
1944: The Axis lost the Kingdom of Bulgaria because of the armed rebellion throughout the country and specifically the military coup in the capital.
1945: The Empire of Japan officially surrendered to China.

 

Kangoku-beya were prison-like hanba which used violence and debt-bondage to retain labour. Working hours at work sites with kangoku-beya were often between 13 and 16 hours a day, and food at these worksites was invariably of poor quality, often with nothing more than rice gruel, miso and perhaps a few pickles for most meals. Despite the poor quality of food and accommodation, the hanba head subtracted a large hanba fee from labourers’ salaries, which covered food and board.

Moreover, hanba heads ran small stores, overcharging labourers for a number of daily essentials, and goods necessary for use in the workplace, which were again subtracted from labourers’ salaries. As mentioned previously, some contemporary social commentators referred to kangoku-beya as a ‘modern slavery’ system, and described conditions within them as ‘a living hell’.^39^ They were poorly constructed, filthy places, where riots, fights, intimidation, injury and cruelty were commonplace, and in some cases labourers were murdered for attempting to run away.


Events that happened today (September 8):

1941: Axis forces commenced the Siege of Leningrad.
1943: The Allies proclaimed the Armistice of Cassibile by radio; OB Süd immediately implemented plans to disarm the Italian forces.
1944: For the first time a V-2 rocket hit London.
1949: Richard Georg Strauss, who briefly (and unhappily) served as Reichsmusikkammer, left the world.
1965: Hermann Staudinger, patron member of the SS, expired.
2003: Helene Bertha Amalie Riefenstahl, Reich propagandist, had the decency to finally drop dead.

 

The strikers were joined by the Washington Education Association union president, Larry Delaney, who said, “These are people who put their heart and soul into their work, and they just want to be respected. … The organization that (the union) has shown is off the charts,” he said. “There have been some strikes in the past where we’ve been building the plane in the air, but this union put weeks of work into this to make sure they were ready to stand up.” (tinyurl.com/4vxwbp2j)

 

Groups of banner-carrying workers from Brazil, India, Ital Pakistan, South Korea, Tunisia and other countries joined the march. They were in Philadelphia for the World Congress of UNI Global Union, “a global union federation for the skills and services sectors.” This international federation “has affiliated unions in 150 countries representing 20 million workers.” (uniglobalunion.org)

UNI’s presence and solidarity demonstrated that the fight for workers’ rights knows no borders.

 

Pictured: “Black and Jew: Two typical American types.” (Reproduced from the Fascist periodical La difesa della raza, September 5, 1939, p. 7. Courtesy of Karen Pinkus’s Bodily Regimes.)

Quoting Why Didn’t the Press Shout?: American & International Journalism During the Holocaust, page 341:

On September 1, 1938, citing public safety, the government forbade “foreigners of the Jewish race to establish permanent residence on Italian soil, in Libya, on it Italy’s Aegean possessions” and on September 7 revoked the “concession of Italian citizenship to Jews contracted after January 1, 1919,” and gave them six months to leave the country.

(Confusingly, some sources such as Katy Hull’s The Machine Has a Soul: American Sympathy with Italian Fascism conflate these days and suggest that Rome issued the time limit on ‘foreign’ Jews on September 1st, but apparently it was really September 7th; you can see from the above how the confusion resulted.)

The law applied to at least 7,000 people (possibly as many as 10,000), but only 3,720 of them had left by March 1939.

Quoting Gene Bernardini’s 1977 article The Origins and Development of Racial Anti‐Semitism in Fascist Italy:

[Mussolini’s] decision to formulate a policy which would weld together racism and anti‐Semitism was purely voluntary and flowed naturally from the confluence of Italy’s imperial policies, the ideological tenets of fascism, and Italian national interests as enunciated by the Duce. It was not, as some observers believed, imposed upon Mussolini by official German pressure.^10^

From Klaus Voigt in Jews in Italy under Fascist and Nazi Rule, page 185:

Until the enactment of the racial laws, Fascist Italy had granted admission to Jewish refugees from territories under Nazi rule. Their situation then suffered a drastic setback with the decree of September 7, 1938, which threatened with expulsion the great majority of Jews who had entered Italy as immigrants or refugees after 1918 if they did not leave the country within six months.

The expulsion, however, proved impracticable: by the time the deadline expired, approximately one half of the 9,000 Jews affected by the decree, 4,500 of whom were refugees from Germany and Austria, were as yet without visas to another country and therefore unable to leave Italy. Until August 1939, Jews could still enter Italy with a tourist visa, which enabled them to remain in the country up to six months. When authorities realized that 5,000 mostly destitute people had used this kind of visa only to flee [the Third Reich’s] persecution, it was suspended.

After that, and until May 1940, entry into the country was allowed only on a transit visa in order to board a ship in an Italian harbor. When Italy entered the war in June 1940, the border was closed to Jews. After Yugoslavia’s defeat, this ban was extended to include the territories annexed by Italy.^11^

I would like to talk more generally about antisemitism in Fascist Italy. Many summarize Fascist Italy pre‐1938 was a period of ‘relative tolerance’ for Jews, but this summary leaves a lot unsaid. Benito Mussolini made antisemitic remarks even before the 1930s (though he was usually careful when and where to say them). For example, quoting from Giorgio Fabre in Jews in Italy under Fascist and Nazi Rule, page 60:

Mussolini in Il Popolo d’Italia on June 4, 1919, published his famous piece (“The Accomplices,” “I complici”) against Jewish Bolshevik leaders whom he claimed had been financed by Jewish American bankers[.]

Other Fascists were also quite tolerant of antisemites. Pages 60–1:

Preziosi’s magazine, La Vita Italiana, was transformed into an anti‐Semitic publication, this took on for the Fascist movement and then for the National Fascist Party (PNF) a heavily anti‐Jewish significance, which was reinforced when the magazine was joined by another anti‐Semitic periodical, the Rivista di Milano. Robert Michels, sharp‐eyed as usual, pointed this out immediately in December 1922.^19^ Nor was he the only one to do so.

The newspaper of the small and democratic Republican Party (the party inspired by Giuseppe Mazzini) made a very similar comment.^20^ The symbolic climax in this anti‐Jewish operation came a little later, on March 1, 1923, when the anti‐Semite Pantaleoni was appointed senator under the first Mussolini‐led government and at Mussolini’s wish.^21^ For the very first time in Italy, a party had an official or semiofficial anti‐Semitic wing.

When something similar had happened before the war in the Nationalist Association — a small “nationalist association” which, after the war, set up a real influent party — the “association” had split in two.^22^

Mussolini himself impressed a personal anti‐Jewish mark upon Fascism: his devastating hostility against the Jewish political élite, first and foremost against the élite of the socialist or communist “enemy.” Michels’s intuition, that anti‐Semitism was the result of a struggle within the socialist leadership, was borne out by Mussolini’s course of action after he left the socialist party and founded a movement that was in some respects a competitor of the former.

Take heed to the following! Pages 61–2:

Although this article is similarly anonymous and is not included in his Opera Omnia (Collected Works), it can nevertheless be attributed to Mussolini.^24^ It is dated September 1, 1921, and in it Mussolini commented on the Zionist conference at Karlsbad, which had been attended by Dante Lattes and other Italian delegates. Alluding to them, Mussolini wrote that there were “Jews who are fed up with living [in Italy], which is something that does not trouble us in the least.”

The “anonymous” writer of Il Popolo d’Italia then added, “If Italian — so‐called Italian! — Zionists were to move elsewhere and take with them the whole pack of Treveses, Modiglianis, Musattis, Momiglianos, Sacerdotis (Genosse), Passiglis and that fine Mr. Ottolenghi who has regaled Italy with several strikes of the postal service, it would afford us great pleasure to expedite this ‘exodus.’”^25^

For us anti‐Zionists, the fact that Fascist Italy initially supported Zionism while also tolerating antisemitism is unsurprising. After all, surely any fervent antisemite would prefer that Jews leave his country as soon as possible rather than stay in it!

True, both Fascist Italy and the Third Reich would later oppose mainstream Zionism, but it was not so much Zionism per se that bothered them as it was the British Empire, which held Palestine at that time and came increasingly in conflict with the Fascist empires. Thus the Fascists later suggested alternatives to Palestine, most infamously Madagascar, but also Ethiopia. Keep in mind that the original Zionists themselves proposed their own alternatives to Palestine, such as Patagonia and Uganda.

It is also helpful to examine the Jews who joined the PNF (the subject of the book Italy’s Fascist Jews: Insights on an Unusual Scenario), as this helps illuminate how Fascist antisemitism manifested in subtler ways. Page 63:

[A]s a matter of fact, no Jew had ever held a truly leading post in the party. Gino Arias, the famous nationalist economist, who was a Jew and would receive the party membership card on May 1, 1923, was in fact invited to the momentous Fascist congress held in Naples on October 25, 1922.^30^ But he was quite definitely only a guest. Mussolini himself wrote an extremely chilly and disconcerting letter concerning his invitation, saying that his participation was “not impossible.”^31^

Margherita Sarfatti’s situation, around that time, was in many ways similar. Maybe she was indeed Mussolini’s mistress. And in any case, her being a woman complicated things. In January 1922, when she had in fact a post of some importance, as the editor of the cultural review Gerarchia (of which Mussolini was the editor in chief), her name did not appear. She officially appeared as “direttore responsabile” (that is solely as the person legally responsible in front of authorities) only in February 1925.

(Emphasis added in all cases. It may be useful to compare this to the Nixon régime: a Zionist circle that had some token Jews but manifested antisemitism anyway.)

Thus we see that antisemitism was present in Fascist Italy even before it evolved into a systematic phenomenon in the late 1930s. Indeed, one could argue that Fascism, even at its most tolerant, could not help but be antisemitic, because it was an ultranationalist phenomenon whereas Jews have almost always been a very international people. There is more that I want to say about antisemitism in Fascist Italy, but for the sake of brevity I’ll have to discuss that another day.


Other events that happened today (September 7):

1923: Fascist Italy cofounded the International Criminal Police Commission along with over a dozen other anticommunist countries.
1940: As the Kingdom of Romania returned Southern Dobruja to Bulgaria under the Treaty of Craiova, the Luftwaffe began the Blitz, bombing London and other British cities for over 50 consecutive nights.
1942: Axis marines were forced to withdraw during the Battle of Milne Bay.
1943: The German 17th Army began its evacuation of the Kuban bridgehead (Taman Peninsula) in southern Russia and moved across the Strait of Kerch to the Crimea.
1945: Axis forces on Wake Island, which they had held since December 1941, surrendered to U.S. Marines, and around the same time that the Berlin Victory Parade of 1945 was held.

 

The names of the other four people who died in August in the Fulton County Jail are Montay Stinson, 40 years old, on Aug. 1, who had been held since Oct. 2022 without charges; Christopher Smith, in jail since Oct. 2019 with no bond, found “unresponsive” in the medical unit on Aug. 11; Alexander Hawkins, 66 years old, found “unresponsive” in the medical unit on Aug. 17; and on Aug. 31, 23-year-old Dayvion Blake was killed in a knife attack which injured three others.

Most officials, including Fulton County Sheriff Patrick Labat, claim the solution is to build a new jail at the cost of $1.7 billion and in the meantime transfer 700 inmates to the Atlanta City Detention Center, which has its own history of neglect, human rights violations and deaths.

In fact, it had been slated to be closed and refigured as a community resource center until Mayor Andre Dickens and the Atlanta City Council reneged on their prior vote and promise.

The people who have been named in this article were Black and poor and were challenged in some cases with mental health issues that this profit-driven system provided no care or solutions. Their unnecessary deaths underscore the truth of the abolitionist slogan, “Prisons are concentration camps for the poor.”

 

The march through the [indigenous] community that followed grew to around 200 participants, many carrying white flowers and Puerto Rican flags. They stopped on East Willard Street where Irizarry Jr. was killed. A prayer was led by the pastor who presided over his funeral, and rally members paid respects to the family. Participants laid white roses at a temporary memorial set up at the site.

Chanting “No justice, no peace” and “El pueblo unido jamás será vencido” (the people united will never be defeated), demonstrators marched to the 24th District police headquarters, where they held a concluding rally, chanting, raising fists and calling out their demands before a group of lined-up police officers. Only bike lane posts separated them.

 

Brochures supporting the “No New Jail!” campaign explained that $2 billion would be better spent on jobs, education, mass transit and other community benefits. The Coalition calls for “Care Not Cages” — offering individuals in crisis the care they need and creating alternatives to incarceration. Money bail has been criticized for the way it keeps low-income people, especially people of color, in jail because they can’t afford bail.

Public pressure led the Cuyahoga County Council to scrap plans to build a new jail on a toxic site in Cleveland, but the latest plan is to go ahead with building a new jail in a “cleaner, greener” location in the suburb of Garfield Heights. Bringing the struggle against any new jail to the Labor Day Parade was an important contribution.

20
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

(Mirror.)

During the Civil War, dehumanising the enemies and treating them as invaders was a key strategy that was used in a contradictory way in the Spanish case. Having learned from other tribal conflicts at home and the previous colonial war against Spaniards—during which, according to military archives, chemical weapons were used by Spain in the Rif’s war (Stenner 2019)—some Moroccan soldiers were encouraged by high‐ranking officers to use violence against women.

Mechbal (2011) highlighted how Moroccan soldiers were thought of as naturally or intrinsically violent, corresponding to a tribal structure prone to anarchy and revenge. Some authors have suggested that they might have enjoyed the context of war and brutality; however, this idea should be revised using historical evidence and from an anti‐colonial perspective.

As previously quoted, Franco’s General Queipo de Llano contrasted the brutality of Moroccans against the ‘sissy character’ of Republicans. This brutality was particularly described in relation to sexual violence against women (Bolorinos Allard 2016).

Again, it was part of a political and psychological strategy to spread terror using the ancestral fear of ‘Moors’ that had recently been experienced in the 1934 repression of the miners in Asturias. That terror was particularly focused in small towns, against rural women, as Moroccan soldiers were predominantly deployed in the countryside and rarely fought in cities.^9^


Events that happened today (September 6):

1915: Franz Josef Strauss, former Axis soldier and educator, was born.
1917: Philipp Freiherr von Boeselager, Wehrmacht Major who conspired to murder the Third Reich’s head of state, was born.
1939: South Africa declared war on the Third Reich (around the same time that friendly fire at the Battle of Barking Creek resulted in the British Royal Air Force suffering its first WWII fighter pilot casualty).
1940: King Carol II of Romania abdicated and was succeeded by his son Michael; General Ion Antonescu became the Conducător of Romania.
1944: The Axis lost the cities of Ypres, Belgium and Tartu, Estonia to Allied forces.
1978: Adolf Dassler, bourgeois Fascist, dropped dead.

 

In industries covered by the Railway Labor Act, federal regulations hostile to labor unions require mediators to rule that there is no point to further negotiations before mediators give the go-ahead for a strike. A 30-day cooling off period is then required. Additionally, the president or Congress can step in and block or delay a work stoppage.

However, the flight attendants’ willingness to strike for their rights takes place at a time when 88% of young workers in the U.S. support labor unions, according to @GBAOStrategies. The pro-union sentiments of most workers can be seen on the streets and in workplaces in many U.S. cities. Workers at unorganized shops, such as Starbucks, Amazon, Jollibee and other corporations are fighting for union recognition and contract agreements are at the highest rate in decades.

Encouraged by an unprecedented contract victory by Teamsters at UPS, 97% of workers in the United Auto Workers voted to authorize a strike. The union’s demands include a 46% wage increase, restoration of traditional pensions for all workers, return of the cost-of-living allowance, reducing the workweek to 32 hours from 40 and increasing retiree pensions.

 

The NLRB Cemex ruling throws out the ill-gotten election — borne of blatant lies, fearmongering and intimidation — and orders Cemex to recognize and bargain with the Teamsters. Ornelas is to be reinstated with full back pay and benefits, upholding a previous judge’s order.

The decision also overturns corporate-backed NLRB decisions which had systematically negated the 1935 National Labor Relations Act’s (NLRA) original intention and practice. The Labor Board’s 1949 “Joy Silk doctrine” required that, in order to be recognized, unions show by a signed card checkoff that a majority of workers wish to join the union. The burden of demonstrating the need for an election was put on the employer.

 

(Mirror.)

Along with harming millions of humans who were indisputably Jewish, the Third Reich’s antisemitism also harmed a significant number of people who either never or no longer identified as ‘Jewish’, in any meaning of the word. The German Fascists were well aware of these people, mentioning them in, for example, the children’s book Der Giftpilz, and they didn’t care; they treated them as Jews all the same.

Although there were certainly some commonalities, such as the ‘Aryanization’ of their businesses, the experiences of people who were legally ‘Jewish’ still differed quite substantially from those of Judaists and other self‐identified Jews:

Thus, by the late 1930s, the Eisigs, like all other ‘full Jews,’ had lost most of their ‘Aryan’ friends, and were practically alone, apart from several private relationships. Yet—and this is the primary focus of this article—unlike self‐identifying ‘Jews,’ they could not turn to their ‘fellow Jews.’ […] Self‐identifying Jews constructed a semblance of normality amidst the abnormality, through their interactions with one another.

On the other hand, non‐Jewish ‘Jews’ [meaning individuals who were ‘Jewish’ only according to the Nuremberg laws] like the Eisigs became truly isolated. Exceptional in their interpersonal relations within the ‘Aryan’ sphere, the Eisigs, like other non‐Jewish ‘Jews,’ could not maintain ‘normality.’

[…]

Yet, as can be seen through the examples of the Eisigs, Klemperers, and of Walter Blumenthal (discussed below), these patterns of interactions of non‐Jewish ‘Jews’ (including marriage choices and Lekebusch’s findings), combined with the reasons inherent to leaving the Jewish community entirely, support the claim that there existed a cohort of non‐Jewish ‘Jews’ which was minimally socially connected to self‐identifying Jews and was often uninvolved in Jewish organizations.

All these factors taken together suggest that the social loss experienced by all ‘Jews’^81^ was worse for non‐Jewish ‘Jews’ because the latter had a smaller pool of Jewish friends to turn to or, at least, were of a social disposition that inclined them toward shunning communal Jewish activities.

Integrating into a Jewish community was not an easy fix, and relatively few people attempted to do so, since it basically meant starting life all over:

Thus, even if some did attempt to take part in Jewish communalism after 1933, perhaps for pragmatic reasons, our starting points when analyzing their actions should be entirely different. Living an intentionally non‐Jewish life before 1933 would make any transition into a Jewish world after 1933 exceedingly difficult, regardless of the willingness of the individual.

An example of this was the difficulty that Judeo‐Christians (if you’ll allow me to use the term) had in adjusting to a Jewish school, where they felt incongruous:

[W]hile the Jewish school system was already in existence, it took time for the disparate collection of schools for the children of ‘Christian Jews’ to be set up.^92^ Equally, the Jewish community provided more than just schooling [but] for the majority of non‐Jewish ‘Jewish’ children who were forced to attend Jewish schools, the (inconsistent) provision of Christian lessons was no protection from the associated separation from the surrounding school. Where Jewish children finally found themselves in an environment in which they were not treated as different to their peers, non‐Jewish ‘Jewish’ children were segregated, yet again.

Jewish schools simply did not specialize in accommodating children of other faiths, for obvious reasons. While the placement in Jewish schools might have been better than nothing, it was still an awkward fit for Judeo‐Christian students who must have come across as incompetent and they likely did not wish to be there at all. Try to imagine forcing a neoclassical musician to attend heavy metal lessons (or vice versa) and hopefully you’ll understand the ordeal.

Sadly, few outsiders were interested in accepting legally ‘Jewish’ immigrants:

[A]s Kevin Ostoyich’s research on the Catholic St Raphael Society’s attempts to help non‐Jewish ‘Jews’ reveals, and as the society’s emigration representative in Germany, Johann Friedrich, realized: ‘no one wanted the Jews … the Catholic Church was mistaken if it believed the outside world would look past race and accept these persons as Catholics.’^101^ Even when Friedrich was finally able to help 3,000 Catholic ‘non‐Aryans’ escape to Brazil, this was in the context of repeated rejections from other consulates.

In the Eisig family memoirs, there is no evidence of international organizations proactively seeking to help them emigrate. Rather, Ludwig and Amalie managed to emigrate with the assistance of individual contacts. Gerhard was helped by an English Quakers group and their ‘Germany Emergency Committee.’ However, he only connected with them through his friendship with an individual he had met during his time studying in Manchester.^102^

(Emphasis added in all cases.)

Unmentioned in Legg’s research is how some legal ‘Jews’ took their own lives, heartbroken that all of their hard work at assimilation had been for naught. Quoting Christian Goeschel’s Suicide in Nazi Germany, pages 110–1:

Take the case of the pensioner Dora G from Prenzlauer Berg, a working‐class district in the centre of Berlin. She gassed herself in her kitchen on 4 March 1943. She was due for deportation and announced her suicide to her non‐Jewish husband and her neighbours. She left a suicide note, written under great stress and almost unreadable, on the kitchen table. In it, she declared:

For forty long years I have been married to Aryans, in my first marriage in America […] For 34 years married to an Aryan, had no contact to Jews, brought up the children in an Aryan way and took them to holy Communion, exercised no Jewish influence on them […] did not marry according to Jewish faith, 1905 in America, married according to Protestant rituals […] never did any harm to anyone, always worked (as a girl and as a woman) […] I am only sorry for my dear ill husband, I like to die, there I am safe.⁶⁵


Events that happened today (September 5):

1876: Wilhelm Josef Franz Ritter von Leeb, Axis field marshal and war criminal, stained the world with his life.
1919: Elisabeth Volkenrath, SS officer, arrived to burden humanity.
1937: Llanes fell to the Spanish fascists following a one‐day siege.
1938: Chilean officials executed a group of youths affiliated with the fascist National ‘Socialist’ Movement of Chile after they surrendered during a failed coup.
1941: The Axis absorbed Estonia.
1942: The Empire of Japan’s high command ordered withdrawal at Milne Bay, the Eastern Axis’s first major defeat in land warfare during the Pacific War.
1943: The Axis lost the Lae Nadzab Airport (near Lae in the Salamaua–Lae campaign) to the Western Allies’ 503rd Parachute Infantry Regiment.
1953: Richard Walther Darré, Reich Minister for Food and Agriculture as well as Chief of the SS Race and Settlement Main Office, expired.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He was a landlord and a riot cop?

She hit two targets with one arrow!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the Headquarter of the Arrow Cross Party, today the House of Terror

(Source.)

The House of Terror museum in Budapest, “which restricts the Holocaust to a couple of rooms while devoting the rest of its ample space to communist crimes,”^75^ meticulously lists Jews among the communist perpetrators but not among the victims of the Stalinist system.^76^

For Randolph Braham, the House of Terror attempts to turn [the Third Reich’s] last ally into its last victim,^77^ an attempt furthered in 2014 with the inauguration of Budapest’s Memorial to the Victims of the German Invasion depicting Hungary as [its] victim, but ignoring Hungary’s responsibility and collaboration with the [Third Reich] in exterminating Jews.^78^

As I have shown elsewhere, this memorial is an amalgam between Deflective Negationism, Double Genocide and Holocaust Obfuscation.^79^

(Source.)

The narration of its permanent exhibition draws no distinction between the policies of the Hungarian Arrow Cross Party, which held power from October 1944 to April 1945, and the [people’s republic], which held power between 1948 and 1989.

By linking the reign of terror carried out under Hungary’s brand of [fascism] with the subsequent terror experienced under Communism, this museum drew a parallel between the two régimes and, what’s more, declared a continuity between the two kinds of terror.

With this, it aligned itself with that controversial, revisionist school of historical thought that regards the human devastation wreaked by these two types of dictatorship, and the régimes themselves, as of essentially the same nature.

Since the history of Communism is depicted only in part, the exhibit hardly can be called comprehensive. Not that this was the intention. As the museum director herself publicly has stressed, the institution aims to display terror in all its sensational aspects, to invite visitors to an historical “happening”.

The House of Terror creates a historical narrative that paints a picture of Hungarians as the victims of both Nazism and Communism. In this narrative, the Communist terror persists well beyond the actual fall of Communism — if not to this very day

(Emphasis added in all cases. Source.)

Oh, and a funny thing: Karl Marx’s use of the phrase ‘House of Terror’ actually predates the anticommunists’ use of it, only he used it to refer to a kind of workhouse wherein the capitalists expected the poor to work for them for about one dozen hours a day.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guessed

  1. $1 billion
  2. $459 billion

I checked the answer and I was really close.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What the fuck? I swear that this is at least the second time now that I’ve seen a Polish antisocialist downplay German Fascism. Is their knowledge of their own country’s history really so bareboned that they can’t even name the atrocious policies that the Fascist colonizers regularly enforced?

I feel condescending for saying this, but I’m afraid that sooner or later I am going to have to make a thread overviewing the Third Reich’s atrocities against Poles. I thought that these were already common knowledge but now I guess not.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s a paraphrase based on The Lion of the Desert, not that I was expecting a dullard like you to pick up on that; I don’t expect serious discussions from this subcommunity.

But to put it less dramatically, yes, class struggle shall always be a consequence of capitalism:

To say that "the worker has an interest in the rapid growth of capital", means only this: that the more speedily the worker augments the wealth of the capitalist, the larger will be the crumbs which fall to him, the greater will be the number of workers than can be called into existence, the more can the mass of slaves dependent upon capital be increased.

We have thus seen that even the most favorable situation for the working class, namely, the most rapid growth of capital, however much it may improve the material life of the worker, does not abolish the antagonism between his interests and the interests of the capitalist. Profit and wages remain as before, in inverse proportion.

If capital grows rapidly, wages may rise, but the profit of capital rises disproportionately faster. The material position of the worker has improved, but at the cost of his social position. The social chasm that separates him from the capitalist has widened.

Finally, to say that "the most favorable condition for wage-labour is the fastest possible growth of productive capital", is the same as to say: the quicker the working class multiplies and augments the power inimical to it — the wealth of another which lords over that class — the more favorable will be the conditions under which it will be permitted to toil anew at the multiplication of bourgeois wealth, at the enlargement of the power of capital, content thus to forge for itself the golden chains by which the bourgeoisie drags it in its train.

(Emphasis added. Source.)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The DPRK forces people to not be homeless.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We will never surrender. We either win, or we die. And don’t think that it stops there. You shall have the next generation to fight, and after the next, the next.

We have stood against you for over two hundred years, and as long as capital survives, we shall stay with you until your end.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Answer:

  1. ‘Prior to 1925, [Korean] public works offices within city and regional governments carried out their construction projects by contracting out to sub‐contractors. […] The more complex the division of labor and the network of primary and secondary sub‐contractors, the more the real wages fell below the nominal wage.’ — Ken C. Kawashima, The Proletarian Gamble: Korean Workers in Interwar Japan
  2. Standard of living means the accessibility to goods and services that promote a healthier, happier life. Due to technology and some concessions to the lower classes, such as social security and the rarity of child labor, I’d say that overall there has been some increase in the standard of living for those of us in Imperial America.
  3. Fewer hours reduces profits for the capitalists, whereas more hours increases profits for them. ‘Koreans […] did not work in capital‐intensive, large‐scale factories, but rather in labor‐intensive, small‐ and medium‐sized factories (chūshō kigyō) that employed fewer than 30 workers, and often in factories with fewer than 10 workers (reisai kigyō). These factories had little capital to invest in advanced technology; profits therefore stemmed from the workers’ long working hours and cheap wages.’ — Ken C. Kawashima, The Proletarian Gamble: Korean Workers in Interwar Japan
  4. Yes, and so is the inequality between white and black proletarians.
  5. Profits come from selling more and more crap while giving the workers less and less. For example, ‘[i]n May 1940 the ghetto governor Hans Biebow ordered that factories be set up, where the workers would be paid soup and bread. The Lódz ghetto turned a profit of about 350 million Reichsmarks ($140 million). It made so much money for the [Fascists] that it survived the longest of the ghettos under [Fascism], for even the [Fascists] were sometimes prepared to defer mass extermination of Jews as long as it remained profitable.’ — Adam LeBor, Schicklgruber’s Secret Bankers
  6. See the introduction of the Krupp–Renn process in the Empire of Japan. ‘Sometime before the autumn of 1938, [Krupp] sent Voss, a chief engineer, to Chongjin, and his job was to guide facilities construction and the start of operations. He was followed by two fitters and one kiln foreman, whose job was to give guidance regarding the start of operations and the handling of equipment thereafter.^34^ Separately, Remag, a German subsidiary of Österreichische Magnesitwerke, sent one bricklayer.^35^ Remuneration for the fitters was based on a rate written into the technology introduction contract and was paid in accordance with the number of hours worked, while the wage for the kiln foreman was fixed at a daily rate of 4 pounds sterling (about 70 yen).’ — Kudō Akira, Japanese–German Business Relations
  7. Labor‐intensive industries favor the use of manual or ‘blue collar’ workers, whereas capital‐intensive industries focus on finances and favor ‘white collar’ workers. ‘[T]he Mitteleuropäische Wirtschaftstag aimed to shift Southeastern Europe into more labor‐intensive cash crops for export, such as soybeans. […] German economists similarly saw Serbians, Croatians, and Romanians as capable of “bearing any burden,” perfectly suited for producing the labor‐intensive goods like soybeans and wheat that Germany’s capital‐intensive economy so desperately needed in the 1930s.^13^’ — Stephen G. Gross, Export Empire
  8. Laborers striking en masse for better wages. Because they put a halt to production, eventually the capitalist must accede to their demands.
  9. Although minimum wage increases are expected to increase prices, the magnitude of price increase depends on several factors such as the demand elasticity and competition degree (Aaronson 2001). A strong effect of minimum wages on inflation is not always found in empirical studies.
  10. The struggles for higher wages relates to socialism (that is, capitalism’s negation) in that the goal is to enhance the standard of living for ordinary people. Equating the struggle for higher wages with the accumulation of capital is a false equivalence because higher wages are necessary for living the modern world, whereas capital is doomed to disappear because it inhibits the lives of the proletariat.
  11. For workers paid on the basis of products or services finished rather than time, their wages may be a little closer in value to the products or services, but still inferior. (I know that this is a simplistic and inadequate reply, but at this point I’m exhausted.)

I feel dissatisfied with this comment, but I hope that it is better than nothing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Oh. That’s a good point. You really showed me how wrong I was. I wish that I were as smart as you.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

It sometimes happens that that the workers themselves give themselves over to racism. This happens when, threatened with massive unemployment, they attempt to concentrate it on certain groups: Italians, Poles or other “filthy foreigners,” “dirty Arabs,” “[insert slur here],” etc. But in the proletariat these impulses only occur at the worst moments of demoralization, and don’t last. As soon as he enters into struggle the proletariat clearly and concretely sees its enemy: it is a homogeneous class with an historical perspective and mission.

On the contrary, the petit bourgeois is a class condemned. At the same time it is also condemned to be unable to understand anything, to be incapable of fighting: it can do nothing but […] flail about in the vice that crushes it. Racism is not an aberration of the spirit: it is and will be the petit bourgeois reaction to the pressures of big capital. The choice of a “race,” that is of the group upon whom the destruction will be concentrated, obviously depends on the circumstances.

Amadeo Bordiga

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Yep, and I see from your comment history that you would have benefitted immensely from lurking here, with such classic misconceptions as ‘Stalin was […] [a] left wing fascist.’ That is silly. Nobody elected Stalin with the goal of saving capital and abolishing the lower classes’ gains. I’m afraid that only capitalism’s economic pressure can inspire you to educate yourself now, because otherwise there’s no hope for you.

view more: ‹ prev next ›