No physical mechanisms predefines future events (or is there one ?).
So, I could state that the future does not exist yet and the past as ceased to exist.
in that statement I have a problem with the definition of existence. Does the definition of existence exist itself ? This is (is it ?) more a problem of terminology than philosophy or physics.
Bonne fête Camus !
(si toutefois vous êtes grand-père. Sinon, bonne fête à un grand-père de votre choix 😋)
Votre imagination est juste car je n'étais pas au courant.
I guess this tilted vertical axis wind turbine could be great on land as well.
This is a very good formulation and completely in line with current physics...
...from which I am trying to break away a little bit !
Please, let us move this conversation under the main post at : https://lemmy.ca/post/5016031
Thanks for your time and attention.
We have never observed anything in the universe just popping into existence from nothing (...)
if we did, that would be a major shift in physics. in this regards I heard of (or read of) two candidates :
.1 if universe's expansion continues to accelerate, (it would mean) dark energy is increassing.
.2 an excess of hydrogen (clouds) outside of galaxies was observed that is difficult to explain with current cosmology.
I know these are not direct observation of something popping up, ...but still.
I think there must be a mechanism behind the (stated) laws. This is what interest my reflection.
On a side note :
is there something in nature that prescribes the conservation of energy ?
(please, if you answer this, do so under my other comment (big bang...) ...I don't want to lose track of the main topic).
I am trying to find a loophole for the origin of the big Bang or whatever created the universe.
P.S. What I'm saying could be something like : "if a system is empty it doesn't contain the first law".
in my post header you will find a link to the original post. This place is for my personal archiving and testing.
Nevertheless, if I follow what you are saying here you mean to say : by changing frame of references we can violate conservation of energy ...or am I missing something ?
Please, let us move this conversation under the main post at :
https://lemmy.ca/post/5016031
My misquotation was on purpose.
in the same thread of thoughts : if there was a system without the first law, anything could appear as if by magic !
...that is, until the 1st law appears.
Anthropologically speaking this is the best answer. Our brain needs a certain span of time to establish perceived reality.