It's a react component and that would be the proper way to give a numerical value in jsx
ABC123itsEASY
joined 1 year ago
It reminds me of Charlie the Unicorn which has a similar cadence
Tolerance is a social contract not a right. If you are tolerant, you earn tolerance for yourself. If you are intolerant, you don't deserve tolerance yourself. It's really not that complicated imo. I don't feel the need to be tolerant of racist, bigoted people.
Pretty sure WinSCP is the best SCP/FTP client on any platform.
Ah interesting one of those cases where this could be one of a few languages. I was reading it as JS.
Yea uh is this actually equivalent? In all of those other cases you're checking if a is null and in the last case my understanding is it is checking to see if a is falsely. In the case that a is 0, or undefined, or an empty array or any other kind of non null falsey value, then the behavior would be different.
Mine was The Point. 🎵 Me and my Arrow 🎵
You're splitting hairs here I think it's fair to make the statement that tech industry workers perform professional tech work. I mean it's cool that you learned to bake but what makes you think this means you know what the skill requirements are for tech workers and how well chatgpt can cover for gaps in those skills? Your dismissive 'meh' says to me 'yea but I learned how to bake with chatgpt so I disagree with this statement'.
Professional tech work at home is professional tech work. I think to anyone who actually have careers in technology wouldn't see a distinction here. Programming is not the same as systems architecture, systems management etc. Programming is simply one of the tools you use as a software engineer. I do not think it's too broad to be meaningless and I think comparing learning to bake to software engineering is reductive and shows a lack of understanding about the requirements of the field.
So? Are you saying you disagree with the premise of the article because chatgpt taught you how to bake? Professional tech work isn't really relatable to baking at home.
If bigfoot is real, then he's basically made it to the age of AI and it may be impossible to conclusively prove that he does exist using photographic evidence. I have a feeling that because of AI we won't be able to use photographic evidence the same way anymore.
Wow wonder how that's gonna run.