13esq

joined 2 years ago
[–] 13esq -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

Which is what would happen if they decided not to go thru with transitioning as an adult...

That is quite obviously an assumption. You are extrapolating data and although I see the logic of your argument, it's bad science. The rest of your comment is based on this premise.

[–] 13esq 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

The forty years worth of proof you are referring to is in almost all cases where the use was to block early puberty and then allow it to take its course at a normal age. There are very few case studies regarding the extended use of puberty blockers during the years where it would typically take place. I did mention these things.

How much proof I would need is a tough question because it obviously requires testing on children and it's an ethical issue. If a consensus of respected doctors were to agree, I wouldn't argue though.

At the end of the day, I'm not pretending to be an expert in puberty blockers, I'm saying that sometimes children need to be protected from themselves.

[–] 13esq 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (18 children)

I don't know why people are so worried about it

As far as I understand it, there are two main concerns that people have.

  1. There is very limited data regarding clinical proof that the long term use of puberty blockers is 100% reversible in cases that block puberty during the typical years that you would go through it. Traditionally, puberty blockers would be used in cases where children start puberty at extremely young ages, in these cases the puberty blockers would be withdrawn at an age typical for a child to start puberty.

  2. Leading on from point 1. Many people don't trust children to make decisions that could impact them for the rest of their lives. Some parents are concerned they will be met with their child who is now a young adult to be asked "why the hell did you let me make that decision, don't you know the brain is still developing at that age?". I would not want to be held accountable for the countless stupid things I said or beliefs I held at a young age, so I can see why it is a concern.

Personally, I'm broadly in support of trans rights and what people want to do when they're adults is their own business (as long as they're not hurting anyone), but I think allowing a child to make a decision that may impact them for the rest of their lives is a grey area to say the least. Until conclusive evidence is available I'd draw the line for a child at anything that's not 100% fully reversible.

[–] 13esq 2 points 1 month ago

In my union, reps have to be put up for vote every three years, and if even after that you still don't like them, you have the option to go straight to your FTO.

[–] 13esq 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I've lived in the UK since birth and have always had soup spoons.

I thought, "maybe it's a middle class thing", but it's not like they're expensive and they last forever.

https://www.thebigkitchen.co.uk/product/budget-cutlery-soup-spoon/

[–] 13esq 5 points 1 month ago

My girlfriend (32) asked me if I was a boomer. I'm 37 😭

[–] 13esq 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A lot of the time it comes down to how engaging the teller of the story is.

The same story could be told by two different people. One who's animated, emotionally engaged and who appears them self to be very interested, the other, who is the complete opposite of those things.

There are stories that I've found hilarious and/or engaging that upon reflection that were really just a load of pointless nonsense and vice versa stories that feel like they're boring and worthless at the time, but that upon reflection had real gold nuggets of information or wisdom.

This is why I'll always listen to others, I may end up no richer, but there's a chance that I will.

[–] 13esq 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Part of me feels optimistic, the other part feels like silly accusations of anti-Semitism, misogyny, communism and chairman Moa bicycles etc etc, are already being prepared.

[–] 13esq 0 points 1 month ago

That's semantics. I take it you understood the message I was trying to convey.

[–] 13esq 4 points 1 month ago

In principle, there's nothing wrong with the right to buy.

The issue with right to buy is that sold off council stock is not replaced and that many people can't get a council house in the first place.

[–] 13esq 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Am I the only one that thinks this is a weird place to shoehorn in an entirely unrelated issue?

I understand that you feel strongly about the issues faced by trans kids, but I don't see what it has to do with unaffordable house prices.

[–] 13esq 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When you're rich, you make your own rules. Laws are to protect the rich from the dirty poors, not the other way around!

view more: ‹ prev next ›