this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
53 points (98.2% liked)

Politics

1025 readers
1 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 1 year ago
 

A civil rights legal group is challenging legacy admissions at Harvard University, calling it racial discrimination.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Same concept as being 'grandfathered in' based on their grandfather being eligible to vote from the Jim Crow Era.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Republicans wining about "woke anti-legacy agenda" admissions in 3, 2, 1...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this that slippery slope we're always talking about? Let a fake case get ruled on so others can pile on with real cases using that as precedent?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It baffles me how a fake case can even have any legitimacy with the court. Yet here we are...SCOTUS is even more a joke now. It's just so tragic their bad faith & buffoonery affects so many people .

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I wonder if the "plaintiff" can sue the lawyers who brought the case for some kind of False Representation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the practice of giving admissions priority to the children of alumni

I didnt know this was even a thing that was allowed? That seems unfair, it's like nepotism isnt it? I hope this doesn't happen where I live :/

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

It is similar to nepotism and is extremely common, if not universal, in private higher education in the US which is the context for this lawsuit.

I doubt it is limited to the US since we tend to copy practices from other countries that help the wealthy stay in power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yep, it's seemingly what people who complain about Affirmative Action think Affirmative Action is

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't really see the constituonal basis here. Racial discrimination is explicitly prohibited by the Constitution, so there's an obvious angle for calling affirmative action unconditional. That doesn't really exist with legacy admissions.

It's still stupid and shouldn't be a thing, but it's not the job of the Courts to ensure an optimal college admissions system. Saying that it's de facto racial discrimination is a pretty big stretch.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The argument is that legacy admissions are a criterion being used in lieu of race to achieve racial discrimination. Similar systems were an aggressive part of the Jim Crowe South to prevent blacks from voting when they couldn't make skin color-specific rules anymore, where you would have to prove literacy or your grandfather's ability to vote to get a vote in since they knew that no black person could pass those tests.

It's not the strongest case, but it isn't unreasonable and it has a rational basis. I'm skeptical that even a disinterested court would accept the logic on its face and know that the current court will just wallow in its hypocrisy, but I at least understand the principle.

The defense to it is that these elite universities actively desire diversity, so clearly they are not using legacy admits as a proxy for racial discrimination. There's plenty of evidence that there is a different, corrupt-but-legal purpose for these legacy systems that is not racially motivated.

edit: On the flip-side, if indirectly discriminatory policies like these ARE allowed, it gives the universities a clear path forward to continuations of their AA policies. They just need to replace the race of their applicants with proxies for race that are allowed. Theoretically, this logic could force a standoff -- either policies that indirectly have discriminatory outcomes (defined by who?) are illegal or they aren't. Or else you'd have to somehow prove intention to discriminate before you could find a policy illegal, which is another very complex can of worms that the elite universities could probably get around.

And so, like with everything around this case, it likely won't change any real behavior from the elite universities but will seriously fuck with less affluent ones.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This is absolutely hilarious.

Is there discovery process here? I gotta imagine there are some damaging emails about legacy students.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Harvard degrees are ridiculously overvalued. I know a couple of legacy admission students. Neither of them were especially smart either before or after going to Harvard. Since then I realized that there are lots of below average people running around with Harvard degrees. Same thing is probably true for other Ivy schools.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Crickets from the anti AA crowd

load more comments
view more: next ›