this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
40 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

96 readers
5 users here now

Privacy is the ability for an individual or group to seclude themselves or information about themselves, and thereby express themselves selectively.

Rules

  1. Don't do unto others what you don't want done unto you.
  2. No Porn, Gore, or NSFW content. Instant Ban.
  3. No Spamming, Trolling or Unsolicited Ads. Instant Ban.
  4. Stay on topic in a community. Please reach out to an admin to create a new community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Geofence warrants, which require tech companies to cough up data on everyone in a certain geographic area at a certain time, have become an incredibly powerful tool for law enforcement. Sending a geofence warrant to Google, in particular, has come to be seen as almost an “easy button” among police investigators, given that Google has long stored location data on users in the cloud, where it can be demanded to help police identify suspects based on the timing and location of a crime alone—a practice that has appalled privacy advocates and other critics who say it violates the Fourth Amendment. Now, Google has made technical changes to rein in that surveillance power.

The company announced this week that it would store location history only on users' phones, delete it by default after three months, and, if the user does choose to store it in a cloud account, keep it encrypted so that even Google can't decrypt it. The move has been broadly cheered by the privacy and civil liberties crowds as a long-overdue protection for users. It will also strip law enforcement of a tool it had come to increasingly rely on. Geofence warrants were sent to Google, for instance, to obtain data on more than 5,000 devices present at the storming of the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, but they have also been used to solve far smaller crimes, including nonviolent ones. So much for the “easy button.”

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

that doesnt just happen, they probably have better tools now

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Watching this news tidbit make the rounds over the last week, and seeing the titles get more and more clickbaity. It's really interesting.

On day zero and day one, the news resources are pretty cut and dry giving you the summary in the title

But now a few days out, we see the clickbait making its major entrance

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Let us not think they they are doing this out of any alturistic reasoning, but more likely to protect company "trade secrets" in how this data is captured.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The concept of utilising technology to predict crimes / apprehend and investigate criminals is a great idea and I'm all for it. Alot of people cheered for that concept initially, believe it or not. "Predicting and stopping crime before it happens". The idea was hailed by many who were victims and were living during times of fear.

But, lo... Put that tech in the wrong hands, and it becomes a tool for oppression.

[–] Anticorp 5 points 11 months ago

Pre-crime is certainly dystopian