this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
269 points (99.3% liked)

World News

41258 readers
6166 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Sounds good, is there any reason why their assets should not be used to compensate for the damages they are causing?

[–] Brainsploosh 12 points 1 year ago

I'm guessing because a lot of them aren't clearly marked "Russian state war chest part 12", but rather things like "Gazprom reserve fund" or "Oligarchs discretionary fund" which would muddy the border between state and private assets.

State assets might be fine to seize to cover state costs, but the legality of seizing the others' might by grayer.

[–] AngryCommieKender 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd think that's why they haven't been tapped this far. They're holding out to see if they can hand the Ukrainians something when this shit show is over.

[–] cheese_greater 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To what extent would that a be a larger question for like Switzerland and other Russian/dirty-money-heavy shelter jurisdictions?

[–] chitak166 1 points 1 year ago

is there any reason why their assets should not be used to compensate for the damages they are causing?

Losers who would also be responsible for the failure that was Reconstruction.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

I'm honestly shocked they haven't been doing it already, not like any good faith intention can be had at this point of resuming business with Moscow in the wake of things save for a MASSIVE change in the Russian geopolitical psyche.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Seize it all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Lets build a wall and let the Russians pay for it.