Bitcoin

759 readers

1 users here now

Do not use URL shortening services: always submit the real link.
Begging/asking for bitcoins is absolutely not allowed, no matter how badly you need the bitcoins. Only requests for donations to large, recognized charities are allowed, and only if there is good reason to believe that the person accepting bitcoins on behalf of the charity is trustworthy.
News articles that do not contain the word "Bitcoin" are usually off-topic. This sublemmy is not about general financial news.
Submissions that are mostly about some other cryptocurrency belong elsewhere. This sublemmy is exclusive to Bitcoin.
No referral links in submissions.
No Self Promotion

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

CSFFlame

Void_Sloth

A "bug fix" in upcoming core release will kill Ordinals (cointelegraph.com)

submitted 11 months ago by Nerrad to c/bitcoin

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Luke-jr has always seen Ordinals as a threat to #Bitcoin. He intends to offer a solution that will prevent the creation of new ordinals.

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] deafboy 5 points 11 months ago

Of course it's Luke and his "gut feeling" transaction validation algorithm. He has a history of trying to push filters for the transactions he personally dislikes or considers not being real in some sense. Be it satoshidice, OpenTimestamps, ordinals...

But let's take his claim at face value. Does the attacker gains cheaper blockspace by abusing this vulnerability, compared to regular txs of the same size? And if so, why are the miners including them in the block template?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Good. Fuck ordinals. He's right, they're a denial of service attack that causes congestion on the network.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Fine by me. Build a 2nd layer app for that junk.