this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Scotland

498 readers
13 users here now

Fàilte gu Alba!

Mon in tae Scotland!

Welcome to Scotland!

Quick rules:

Have at it, and haste ye back

Related communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

LAWYERS have urged the Crown Office to explain why the probe into the SNP’s finances is taking so long to conclude. Two former sheriffs have suggested that the lengthy investigation could “stimulate perceptions of a cover up” and called for clarity on its progress.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Olap 2 points 1 year ago

Total witch hunt. Heads should be rolling for the handling of this. Especially with black money funding the DUP, the red money for the Tories both being ignored. Double standards and establishment reasoning underlying yet more reasons to be leaving the shambles of Perfidious Albion

[–] ForgotAboutDre 1 points 1 year ago

The SNP promised to spend money on an independence referendum. Such a referendum hasn't happened - despite SNP efforts.

Until such a referendum occurs the money hasn't been misspent. There needs to be a referendum, and the SNP have to not spend at least the amount raised on campaigning for it.

What can the police take to the prosecuter. The prosecutor will ask when was the crime committed. The police will have to tell them in the future.

So it must be a conspiracy to commit a crime you want to charge.

No, they fully intend to campaign for independence and are likely to spend much more than the alleged misallocated funds. In fact campaign for such an event is their reason for existence. To the point where their political opponents routinely accusing them of doing it too much.

The whole thing is a fix up. Money is fungible. You don't need to keep the money you got for one reason to fulfill your spending promises. Otherwise our entire banking system would collapse.

All that has been revealed from this investigation is the SNP finances aren't in a good position. They have made some poor choices, and their leadership was lending them money to keep operating. Because the SNP are reliant on normal people supporting them, and support had dropped because independence wasn't making progress. Labour and the Conservatives don't have these issues, because they have lots of big financial backers like Baron Lebedev of Hampton and Siberia etc.