this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
76 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39040 readers
2716 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Under the economic plans, Czechs will pay more tax on alcohol and medicine. Businesses will also pay more corporate tax.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It’s probably because we’ve all figured out that “austerity measures” are just another name for “redistributing wealth to rich people”. Sure, there’s a balance to be found… but this isn’t it.

Good luck to all the Czech people protesting. Solidarity forever.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Labour unions staged a day of protests and strikes across the Czech Republic on Monday to voice their opposition to the government’s package of cuts and austerity measures meant to keep the ballooning deficit under control.

Prime Minister Petr Fiala criticised unions for not negotiating and said his government was not ready to give in because the measures are “absolutely necessary”.

“The unionists protest because they don't like the development in the Czech Republic under the current government,” Josef Stredula, the head of a major umbrella union organisation, told the crowd of several thousand.

Some 74% or over 7,200 nursery, primary and secondary schools across the country were either fully or partially closed Monday in the biggest such protest since the establishment of the Czech Republic in 1993, unions said.

Workers at hundreds of companies, including some state offices and major carmaker Škoda Auto, were planning to join the protests, mostly by stopping work for an hour or two.

The package is a compromise reached by Fiala’s five-party ruling coalition that took over after defeating populist Prime Minister Andrej Babiš and his centrist ANO movement in the 2021 parliamentary election.


The original article contains 449 words, the summary contains 190 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

This article doesnt really touch on why people are angry. "austerity measures" I know tend to be bad, and reducing a defecit is often not even an economically sound idea... But why is this the biggest protest in Czech history? What's really going on?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Petr not based anymore? That's a shame

[–] mea_rah 3 points 11 months ago

FYI president in many eastern European countries is just a ceremonial figure without much actual power. It's kind of like the king in UK.

The real power is in the hands of the government and its prime minister.

So when the article mentions that the president signed the law, he effectively does not really have any options not to sign it once it was approved by parliament. Outside of very specific cases. For example if he had a good reason to suspect the law is unconstitutional he could have the constitutional court decide whether it's okay. And if it is, he'd have to sign it.